Saturday, December 22, 2012

Obama Uses Inouye Funeral Service to Talk About Himself. (So Who Really Died?)

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 22, 2012


 

 

 

 

 












 
10:34 AM, Dec 22, 2012 • By DANIEL HALPER
President Barack Obama used the funeral for Hawaii senator Daniel Inouye to talk about himself. In the short 1,600 word speech, Obama used the word "my" 21 times, "me" 12 times, and "I" 30 times.

Obama's speech discussed how Inouye had gotten him interested in politics. "Danny was elected to the U.S. Senate when I was two years old," he said.

Speaking to the audience at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., Obama talked about his family and their vacations. "Now, even though my mother and grandparents took great pride that they had voted for him, I confess that I wasn't paying much attention to the United States Senate at the age of four or five or six.  It wasn't until I was 11 years old that I recall even learning what a U.S. senator was, or it registering, at least.  It was during my summer vacation with my family -- my first trip to what those of us in Hawaii call the Mainland," said Obama.
So we flew over the ocean, and with my mother and my grandmother and my sister, who at the time was two, we traveled around the country.  It was a big trip.  We went to Seattle, and we went to Disneyland -- which was most important.  We traveled to Kansas where my grandmother's family was from, and went to Chicago, and went to Yellowstone.  And we took Greyhound buses most of the time, and we rented cars, and we would stay at local motels or Howard Johnson's.  And if there was a pool at one of these motels, even if it was just tiny, I would be very excited. And the ice machine was exciting -- and the vending machine, I was really excited about that. 

VS: SO WHO OR WHAT ACTUALLY PERISHED? DANIEL INOUYE OR BARACK'S BOYHOOD DREAMS?

Friday, December 21, 2012

Kerry squeaky clean Secretary of State nominee? Hold on -- where's the beef? It's right here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW OBAMA SEES IT . . .

President Barack Obama has nominated Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) for Secretary of State. 

Kerry, a decorated Vietnam War veteran and 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, will replace Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Kerry became the clear frontrunner for the position when U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice withdrew her name from consideration. Rice stepped aside citing concern that the confirmation process would have been "lengthy, disruptive and costly" due to persistent Republican opposition to her response to the Sept. 11 anniversary attack on a U.S. compound Benghazi, Libya.

Kerry has been member of the Foreign Relations Committee for 27 years, the last six as chairman. The senator has traveled extensively in his capacity as intrepid lawmaker and unofficial envoy for Obama, tamping down diplomatic fires in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Egypt, the AP reports.

"He is not going to need a lot of on-the-job training," Obama said during the nomination announcement.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/john-kerry-nomination-_n_2346827.html?icid=maing-grid7|maing5|dl2|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D248993

Verne:
Something seems amiss here. I don't know, maybe it's that all the crap associated with Kerry's career is totally ignored. This sounds like a squeaky-clean young daddy who has been suggested for the post of local PTA chairman. Where's the beef?

Here's some of it -- Kerry seems a waffler who will run for the exits at the first whiff of smoke. His loyalty to our Armed Forces is a leaky boat in a tsunami. He co-starred with Hanoi Jane Fonda in a propaganda blitz praising Viet Cong partisans, sneering at U.S efforts in Viet Nam.

So let's deal with the crap before President Obama's shoo-in nominee is hurried through the confirmation process. Here are some choice nuggets:

AND NOW THE REST OF US . . .

There are questions for which Kerry’s record provides no sure answers. After serving as a navy officer on a Swift boat on patrol against Viet Cong forces in the vast Mekong River delta of South Vietnam, he returned as an anti-war founder of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Kerry was no ordinary protester. He made a show of throwing away his medals, which included a silver star for bravery and three purple hearts for wounds that did not require hospitalization. Kerry’s antics were enough to get President Richard Nixon to ask who this guy was and how he came to have such a strong anti-war viewpoint. Kerry answered that question in testimony before a congressional committee in which he enumerated war crimes, the destruction of villages, the alienation of Vietnamese by the rough tactics of U.S. forces.

Kerry’s position on the U.S. role in Vietnam struck a popular chord in the U.S. as protest rose to the point at which the U.S. withdrew its troops in 1973, two years before the North Vietnamese stormed south on the way to victory.

Many people would commend him for contributing to understanding the horrors of the war. Others would accuse him of betraying the U.S. forces in which he served, of denigrating the sacrifices of those who also served in Vietnam and of misunderstanding the feelings of millions of South Vietnamese who looked to the U.S. to defend them.

In quite a different way, Kerry has gone through reversal on Iraq. Yes, he supported President George W. Bush’s decision in 2003 to wage war against Saddam Hussein, but he completely reversed himself when he ran for president against Bush in 2004 on an anti-war platform.

All of which raises huge doubts as to where Kerry would stand on the U.S. role in conflict anywhere. We can be pretty sure that Kerry, as secretary of state, would declare ritual support of the U.S.-Korean defense treaty, as would anyone in that position. He would enthusiastically call for dialogue with North Korea and would proclaim close ties with the incoming South Korean government.

The question, though, is how he would respond in a crisis. How strongly would he want to face down the North? Would he go for the peace treaty that Pyongyang has long been demanding with Washington? I don’t know of anyone who sees a U.S.-North Korean treaty as anything other than a gambit to separate the U.S. from its South Korean ally and press for withdrawal of U.S. forces, but would Kerry fall for it s a gesture to bring about reconciliation?

Questions about his dedication to America’s allies would extend to Japan and Taiwan. The U.S. has said it would honor its defense relationship with Japan if the current stand-off on the Senkakus were to explode in armed conflict. One has to wonder, though, if he would share this sentiment. Or would he be more anxious to appease Beijing than to defend American allies?

Kerry’s record on foreign policy has been one of dramatic shifts. The history shows he’s loudly opposed U.S. forces at critical moments. Assuming he does become secretary of state, watch out for double-talk, shifting positions and uncertain loyalties.


*****************

Verne: So I ask you -- with Ms. Rice out of the way, how capable and trustworthy a nominee has Obama pushed on-stage in the person of John Kerry?

I submit that Squire John deserves another pat-down at the TSA security station. Something big is being hidden away somewhere. We should find it before moving further. 

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 21, 2012

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Texas Democratic Party leader, blogger calls for shooting NRA members

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 21, 2012

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" he tweeted.

After reading about the tweets on another site, Yvonne Larsen noticed a familiar name.

"Among the selection of tweets advocating for the murder of NRA President Keene and all NRA members was a name familiar to me; probably familiar to many readers of Houston’s Liberal blog sites," she wrote at Big Jolly Politics.

Larsen said she "pasted a screen shot from the Freedom’s Outpost story in case NASA employee and Democrat Precinct 699 Chair John Cobarruvias of the Houstonblog Bay Area Houston tries to delete his tweet."

"You are an embarrassment to precinct chairs everywhere - and Americans. You sound like the next crazed shooter," one person tweeted in response.

Ironically, after calling for the deaths of NRA members and their defenders, Cobarruvias called the NRA domestic terrorists.

"Let's face it. The #NRA is nothing but a domestic terrorist organization. They have done NOTHING to stop this violence except make excuses," he added.

On Saturday, he posted a comment on his Facebook page asking NRA members to "un-friend" him and issued a disturbing message.

"They need to [be] wiped off the face of the earth," he wrote, speaking of the NRA and those who support owning guns.

"Personsally if they were wiped off the planet it wouldn't hurt my feelings one bit," he wrote in another comment.

We contacted the Texas Democratic Party for comments on Cobarruvias' tweet, but have not received a response.

Update: Cobaruvvias now says his tweet was not a death threat. He issued an apology and deleted the message, but his Facebook post is still live.

John Kerry in war and peace: U.S. allies would be right to question his reliability

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 20, 2012

































|

John Kerry in war and peace: U.S. allies would be right to question his reliability

Special to WorldTribune.com
By Donald Kirk, East-Asia-Intel.com

The U.S.-Korea relationship is about to undergo a major transition, and that’s not just because Lee Myung-Bak is stepping down after five years in which his American advocates professed their love for him even as his popularity sank ever lower at home. The big difference, from the U.S. perspective, is the likely appointment of a new secretary of state, John Kerry, whose view on Korea may well be quite different from that of his predecessor, Hillary Clinton.

There’s no certainty that Kerry, on the basis of his record from the Vietnam War onward, will be in favor of all the military support the United States guarantees South Korea. The record shows Kerry as an anti-war figure from his student days, a Vietnam War hero who turned against the war and an early advocate of U.S. intervention in Iraq who turned against the U.S. role there too.


John Kerry shared the stage with Jane Fonda at a rally in the early 1970s. /Guardian
So who’s to say where Kerry would end up on Korea? As chairman of the U.S. Senate foreign relations committee, he’s called for dialogue between North and South Korea and between the U.S. and North Korea. It’s not a matter of “rewarding bad behavior,” he’s said, but common sense to negotiate.

He might have been a little disillusioned when North Korea in April launched a long-range missile six weeks after signing off with the U.S. on a “moratorium” on nuclear and missile tests and one week after North Korea’s UN representative solemnly informed him of the North’s intent to honor the deal. Still, it’s a safe bet that Kerry will see dialogue as the next essential step for Korea, North and South.

That’s fine, but where would Kerry stand if the dialogue goes nowhere, or if it results in an agreement that’s quickly broken, or if the North stages another incident in the Yellow Sea, a campaign, perhaps to snatch back one of those islands within easy eyesight of North Korean shore gunners?

Those are questions for which Kerry’s record provides no sure answers. After serving as a navy officer on a Swift boat on patrol against Viet Cong forces in the vast Mekong River delta of South Vietnam, he returned as an anti-war founder of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Kerry was no ordinary protester. He made a show of throwing away his medals, which included a silver star for bravery and three purple hearts for wounds that did not require hospitalization. Kerry’s antics were enough to get President Richard Nixon to ask who this guy was and how he came to have such a strong anti-war viewpoint. Kerry answered that question in testimony before a congressional committee in which he enumerated war crimes, the destruction of villages, the alienation of Vietnamese by the rough tactics of U.S. forces.

Kerry’s position on the U.S. role in Vietnam struck a popular chord in the U.S. as protest rose to the point at which the U.S. withdrew its troops in 1973, two years before the North Vietnamese stormed south on the way to victory.

Many people would commend him for contributing to understanding the horrors of the war.

Many, however, would accuse him of betraying the U.S. forces in which he served, of denigrating the sacrifices of those who also served in Vietnam and of misunderstanding the feelings of millions of South Vietnamese who looked to the U.S. to defend them. In quite a different way, Kerry has gone through reversal on Iraq. Yes, he supported President George W. Bush’s decision in 2003 to wage war against Saddam Hussein, but he completely reversed himself when he ran for president against Bush in 2004 on an anti-war platform.

All of which raises huge doubts as to where Kerry would stand on the U.S. role in conflict anywhere. We can be pretty sure that Kerry, as secretary of state, would declare ritual support of the U.S.-Korean defense treaty, as would anyone in that position. He would enthusiastically call for dialogue with North Korea and would proclaim close ties with the incoming South Korean government.

The question, though, is how he would respond in a crisis. How strongly would he want to face down the North? Would he go for the peace treaty that Pyongyang has long been demanding with Washington? I don’t know of anyone who sees a U.S.-North Korean treaty as anything other than a gambit to separate the U.S. from its South Korean ally and press for withdrawal of U.S. forces, but would Kerry fall for it s a gesture to bring about reconciliation?

Questions about his dedication to America’s allies would extend to Japan and Taiwan. The U.S. has said it would honor its defense relationship with Japan if the current stand-off on the Senkakus were to explode in armed conflict. One has to wonder, though, if he would share this sentiment. Or would he be more anxious to appease Beijing than to defend American allies?

Kerry’s record on foreign policy has been one of dramatic shifts. The history shows he’s loudly opposed U.S. forces at critical moments. Assuming he does become secretary of state, watch out for double-talk, shifting positions and uncertain loyalties.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Sandy Hook Mental Health: Program Gaps May Be Easier To Fix Than Gun Laws.


Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 20, 2012
 
 

Posted:   |  Updated: 12/19/2012 10:00 pm EST



WASHINGTON -- Days before the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, a boy in Milwaukee confessed to one his teachers that he had been troubled by voices and delusions. The voices were insisting that he do harm, that he shoot people.
He told the teacher that he had access to a gun at home. He said that he was prepared to bring the gun to school.

This is a scenario that unfolds thousands of times every year across the U.S. It may not involve a school like the high school in Milwaukee or an elementary school in Newtown, Conn. But the catalysts are all hauntingly familiar -- isolation and a troubled teen or young adult in crisis.

Friday's massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary has drawn considerable attention to gun control, with politicians pondering another assault weapons ban, a potential curb on high-capacity magazines, and background checks at gun shows. On Wednesday, President Barack Obama announced the formation of a task force to address the gun issue, which he vowed would not be like other Washington commissions. He said he expects concrete proposals on his desk in January.

Less attention has been focused on forging a better policy on mental health care for at-risk kids. Obama devoted a line to the topic while announcing his gun task force. But mental health legislation may be an easier fix and an easier sell to Congress.

There are ways of preventing more Sandy Hooks or Auroras. The solutions are out there, and many have long been in practice. 

That Milwaukee teacher did not call the police. Nor did the teacher ignore the boy. The high school knew exactly how to get the teen immediate help.

School officials dialed Milwaukee's Mobile Urgent Treatment Team, recalled its director, Dr. Chris Morano.

"We knew this was a high risk," Morano explained. His team went to the school, where they assessed the boy on the spot. With the mother's help, the team's clinicians surrounded him with services. He was temporarily hospitalized and began taking medication to help beat back his inner demons, hush his impulsiveness and stamp out his turn-on-a-dime aggressiveness. He and his family began developing a treatment plan with county workers.
The team then assigned him a sort of mental-health bodyguard as someone he or his mother can call 24 hours a day, Morano said. The boy would continue getting services for as long as needed.
Morano's team is just one of the entry points into Milwaukee County's social services program, known as Wraparound Milwaukee.

The program, started in 1995, aims to treat the city's most vulnerable -- children and adolescents with deep emotional disorders who have been swept up in foster care or entangled in the juvenile justice system. For the roughly 550 youth and family members it serves every year, Wraparound Milwaukee provides coordinated services and therapies with one catch: Families -- not bureaucrats -- lead the treatment plans.

Bruce Kamradt, Wraparound Milwaukee's director, explained the philosophy to HuffPost in February. "It's around strengths and needs of kids," he said. "Better we plan this together. We'll look at family needs too. If the youth problem is he's in a gang and the mother really needs to get out of this neighborhood, we may find alternative housing. If she needs a job, we'll try to find a job for her. We're going to focus not only on the kid's need but the family's need."

Morano agreed. "Our innovation is that we go to the community, we go to families," he said. He called parents the "X Factor." "How the parent or caregiver is handling the stress of the trauma. This, to me, is the single most important factor in how well a child will adjust in the aftermath," he explained. "Parents have to handle their own stress and anxiety, appear as confident and assured as they can. ... This is vital in helping kids feel good again."

Wraparound Milwaukee also serves an additional 350 kids who are not attached to the courts, Morano said. The aim is to keep those kids out of the judicial system. "We recognized that it was vital to provide as early and as preventative services as possible," Morano said.

Once they get a sense of the family's needs, Wraparound Milwaukee matches the family with service providers. As Kamradt suggested, the program prides itself on being flexible and not offering the same old individual therapies. It all sounds pie-in-the-sky -- empowering families to stabilize their own children through government agencies and nonprofits. Despite the odds, the ideas have taken root. State and county data analyzed by Kamradt's team show that of 411 new youth enrolled from October 2009 to July 31, 2010, only 11.9 percent committed new offenses. Its 2011 annual report shows high rates of school attendance, stable families, and satisfaction among families and kids.

The innovations are not under-publicized. Wraparound Milwaukee was the subject of a PBS documentary. In 2009, the Harvard Kennedy School of Government gave the program an an innovator award. It's become a national model.

"With respect to this most recent tragedy, I have to to tell you that in Milwaukee we've done a tremendous turnaround," Morano said.

It is a turnaround not widely enjoyed elsewhere. Too many jurisdictions' mental health budgets are consumed by costly hospitals for the most extreme cases, favoring bed space over prevention programs. "The problem is that right now kids in particular get very poor services nationwide," said Robert Bernstein, president of the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, an advocacy organization based in Washington.

If you want solid, flexible services, you can get them only after you've been hospitalized multiple times, Bernstein added.

Youth Villages, a nonprofit based in Tennessee that works with a number of states, does in-home services for children. Its stats show that more than 80 percent of kids remain with their family one year after completing the program. More than 80 percent of kids report no arrests. Youth Villages works in 11 states and D.C., yet admissions in 2010 were barely above 4,000.

"There's good science around what you are supposed to do," said Dr. Tim Goldsmith, Youth Villages' chief clinical officer. "There's really no question. People just don't do it. For some it's a lack of knowledge. For some its a lack of skill. For some, it's a lack of funding. When you have a young adult in a mental-health system ... it's going to be the luck of the draw with what you're going to get.
"
Mississippi has wraparound services. But it's nowhere near full funding and doesn't cover the state equally. "Even with the problems with the wraparound, the number of families who are getting to participate in that is very small," explained Joy Hogge, executive director of Mississippi Families As Allies.

Resources or not, cities and states have found ways to innovate at one of the most common intersections between a person in crisis and government.

In the late '80s, the Memphis Police Department decided it needed a better way to deal with these residents. After one confrontation ended in a fatal police-involved shooting, the department created the Crisis Intervention Team model. Along with training for rank-and-file cops, the department developed what amounts to a mental-health version of a SWAT team of officers who go through more intensive trainings.

Memphis residents are no longer afraid to call the police when a loved one is having problems. In 1988, Crisis Intervention Team officers fielded 3,000 calls for service. They now receive roughly 12,000 calls per year. Dozens of police jurisdictions have adopted the program, from Georgia to Seattle to D.C. "There are a lot of officers who are willing to get this training," explained Philip Eure, executive director of D.C.'s Office of Police Complaints. "It's a way of sensitizing people on the front lines."

When judges in Washington noticed that their courtrooms were seeing too many mentally-ill residents charged with minor offenses, they created what's called mental health community court.

One study from Georgetown University Law Center and North Carolina State University noted that five such courts showed reductions in recidivism at least during a defendant's interaction with the courts. Two courts showed reductions two years after the defendant left the court system. The study, which looked at D.C. Superior Court's program, reported that defendants said they had positive experiences and strongly identified with the court's goals.

Magistrate Judge Joan Goldfrank presides over the juvenile version of the court. At least 50 kids have completed the program since the court began about two years ago. She said it has been a success because it makes sure kids get promised services and it empowers parents. "I see kids and parents that can actually have a conversation with each other," Goldfrank told HuffPost. "There's a lot of anger for lots of reasons by many of the kids ... I try to meet the kids where they are."

Eddie Ferrer of DC Lawyers for Youth has had two clients in Goldfrank's courtroom, which he called "fantastic." For one client in particular, he said, the court made a "world of difference." "One of the main reasons it works is because there is meaningful services being provided that try to address the core issue as to why that young person is acting out," he said.

Other juvenile clients aren't so lucky. Ferrer said he has clients who have been waiting six to nine months and still have not received quality mental health services.

The need doesn't go away. Back in Milwaukee, Morano said he gets calls from high schools all day long. Earlier this week, a kid walked into his office with a care coordinator. He was struggling with violent hallucinations. "He was so distraught by what he was thinking and experiencing," Morano said. "He couldn't bring himself to tell me the details. But he wanted help."

His team, Morano said, also assessed a youth who talked about wanting to replicate Sandy Hook.
"He gestured with his hands about shooting people in class," Morano said.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Friendly Australian bloke says his country has been there, done that, on gun control. And warns U.S. to stand clear!



















Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 18, 2012

I had heard about this post from some bloke in Australia, who served up a special version of gun control Aussie-style. Since I love the Aussies, my first impulse to chuckle at it -- until I became aware that the writer was deadly serious. There's a lot of great info here to dissuade our own American gun owners from being deluded into yielding their rights because of propaganda from sketchy gun control advocates. It's worth a read. 

                                                                
                                                                          
Hi Yanks,
I thought you all would like to see the real figures on gun control from Down Under. The plan has backfired.

 
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.



The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are gua ranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns....' You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.


The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.


Take note Americans, before it's too late! Will you be one of the sheep to turn yours in?


NC Supreme Court: Justice Paul Newby can hear election districts case

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 18, 2012

newby.jpg
 Justice Newby


WWAY 12/18/12

RALEIGH, NC (AP) -- The North Carolina Supreme Court says Justice Paul Newby can consider a lawsuit challenging the way election districts are drawn.

The News & Observer of Raleigh reported the court has rejected a request from the state NAACP, Democrats and others that Newby withdraw from the case.

North Carolina NAACP president William Barber says the groups are disappointed with Monday's decision, but think they still have a strong case that the election districts were improperly drawn.

The groups say the state legislative and congressional district boundaries are illegal because they limit black voters' influence on the election process.

The groups had asked that Newby not participate because of political donations they say link people and groups that helped draw the new lines with independent campaign spending for Newby.
ith independent campaign spending for Newby.

Monday, December 17, 2012

S.C. Gov. Haley names Tim Scott to DeMint's Senate seat. Conservatives applaud choice.

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 17, 2012

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley on Monday named Republican Rep. Tim Scott to replace the resigning Sen. Jim DeMint, saying his political “courage,” fiscally conservative acumen and pro-business approach will serve the state and nation well.

“He knows the value of a dollar. He understands what every family and small business goes through, and he has stayed consistent to that,” said Mrs. Haley, a Republican, during an early afternoon news event at the state Capitol to announce her decision.

“This man loves South Carolina, and he is very aware that every vote he does affects South Carolina and affects our country.”

Mr. Scott, who won a second term to the House last month and will be the only black Republican in the new Congress, was rumored to be Mrs. Haley’s top choice since Mr. DeMint announced earlier this month that he will resign from office in January to run the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Mrs. Haley, whose parents were Indian immigrants, brushed aside the notion that Mr. Scott’s race was a factor in her decision.

“It is very important to me, as a minority female, that Congressman Scott earned this seat,” she said. “He earned this seat for the person he is. He earned this seat for the results he has shown. He earned this seat for what I know he’s going to do in making South Carolina and making our country proud.”

Mr. Scott, who asked for a moment of silence for the victims of the Newtown, Conn., school shooting before he spoke at the Columbia news event, vowed to work toward advancing economic development in South Carolina.

“The future is incredibly bright for America,” he said. We have our challenges, we have things that we have to overcome, but, boy, does the future look great in South Carolina.”
Mr. DeMint applauded the governor’s pick, saying she “has made a great choice for South Carolina and the nation.”

Tim Scott is a principled leader and will make an outstanding senator for the people of the South Carolina and an important voice for conservatives across the nation,” Mr. DeMint said in a statement.

“I’ve known Tim for years and am confident he will serve our state with honor and distinction.”
Fiscal and social conservative groups also praised Mrs. Haley’s decision.

“Her pick is truly a fantastic one for fiscal conservatives,” said Chris Chocola, president of the influential Club for Growth, which pushes for limited government spending. “Congressman Scott is a fighter for limited government and pro-growth policies in Washington, and we can’t wait to see him in the Senate.”

Others who reportedly were on the governor’s short list to replace Mr. DeMint were Rep. Trey Gowdy, former state Attorney General Henry McMaster, former first lady Jenny Sanford and Catherine Templeton, director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Mrs. Haley last week said she wouldn’t appoint a “placeholder” for Mr. DeMint’s seat, saying she wanted her pick to be someone who would consider seeking re-election to the seat in 2014.

Mr. Scott will be sworn in to the Senate when the new Congress convenes Jan. 3. Mrs. Haley said Monday she’s confident Mr. Scott easily will win election back to the Senate in two years.