Saturday, October 3, 2015


via Verne Strickland Facebook and USA DOT COM

ResistNet and CommieBlaster ^ | October 29, 2010 | Asst Natl Dir Mellie 
Posted on 10/30/2010, 11:26:51 PM by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Maoists and Islamics are in the US Government. They all believe in a government that’s opposed to the US Constitution and, thus, the America our founders created. They want America to give up its sovereignty and to become a member of a one-world socialist government. For simplicity, let’s call them all “commies”.

We began researching Obama and other commies in US Government and Media about 18 months ago and were shocked. Here’s the high-level overview of what we learned, which is chronicled in great detail at
- America has been at war with communism for over 90 years. The Cold War with Communist Russia did not end with the collapse of the Berlin War -- it just took a different form. A new war has commenced… a bloodless war aimed at taking all of our wealth and giving it to Communists, so they can rule America. This well-planned, decades-old, Communist Takeover is now in progress and we’ve been losing this war because Communists captured our media long ago and they hid this plan from us for years.
- The public code words for Communism now are “Progressive”, “Democracy” and “Social Justice”. You probably never heard these terms much until Obama took office, but you hear them now a lot these days.
- The Democratic Party is now a Socialist Party. Through its freely admitted, long term alliance and coordinated initiatives with The Party of European Socialists, the Democratic Party is openly connected to Chinese and Russian Socialists, as well as a full range of international commies and terrorists.
- Right now in the US Congress, there’s a publicly admitted Socialist, a couple of socialist Islamics, lots of criminals (assault, bribes, etc.), lots of anti-Constitutionalists, and way too many people who are taking money from Islamic terrorist-connected organizations. But don’t let that fool you. There are over 100 US Congress Members who are commies. Most belong to and/or are associated with members of Democratic Socialists of America and the Communist Party USA. The FBI states that the Communist Party USA and the United Nations are departments of the Russian KGB.
- Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Saebarkah), the 44th President of the United States of America is a communist. Obama precisely fits former FBI head, J. Edgar Hoover’s definition of a communist. He has associations with members of the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, was raised by communists, spent his adult life with communists, was mentored by communists, supports communists, belonged to at least one communist organization, attended at least one communist rally, worked for at least two communist bosses, is advised by communists and now, while in office, regularly meets with communists on a daily basis.
- Obama is an ideological zealot and radical. His core skill is “communist rabble-rousing”. George Soros directly and indirectly funded Obama’s presidential campaign. Obama is George Soros’ puppet. Obama is told what to say by a teleprompter’s script that is written by a George Soros-funded group of commie writers. Obama has a PR organization of over 300 commies.
- Our research strongly suggests George Soros is the face of the USA Communist Takeover. Obama works for George Soros. Most of the media works for George Soros as his propaganda department. Hundreds of socialist, activist and union organizations work for Soros as a means to siphon government money from you, generate votes for commie Democrats and fund the Communist Takeover. Examples of the organizations Soros funds include the Democratic Party, SEIU, ACORN, Tides Foundation, National Public Radio, ACLU, Open Society Institute, and Obama’s favorite fake media outlet, the Huffington Post.
- Goldman Sachs works for George Soros. There is a strong body of evidence to suggest that George Soros, with the help of Jeffrey Sachs of Goldman Sachs, caused the 2008 US financial collapse (Soros and Sachs have done this in other countries before). “Crisis” is Phase Two in the four-phase Communist Takeover Plan. Soros and Sachs can further crash or damage our economy pretty much whenever they want.
- George Soros is a very bad dude and is a far, far greater threat to America than al Queada. George Soros is not only converting America to communism, he’s doing the same in other countries. Remember “the Domino Theory?” Soros may also be coordinating with al Queada and/or terrorists through his connections with Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and/or other radical organizations which Soros funds.
- George Soros’ “boss” is one or more of the following: Communist Russia, Communist China and/or a band of Ultra Rich Global Elites. Soros’ supporters and co-conspirators include Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Jeffrey Sachs (Goldman Sachs), NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Warren Buffet, Oprah Winfrey and a vast group of other global elites. Their combined wealth is greater than many countries.
RESISTING THE TAKEOVER: Exposure and awareness of George Soros, Obama, commie Congress members and their international criminal conspiracy is the key to Americans winning this war. Once the conspirators are exposed, they can be researched, contained, neutralized and prosecuted. So educate yourself and tell others. Vote out all Democrats.
THE TAKEOVER PLAN’S PRIMARY WEAKNESS: There is a very substantial body of evidence that indicates Obama is ineligible to serve as US President (father’s British citizenship, multiple social security numbers, foreign student, no long form birth certificate, no hospital that will claim him, no US State certified him as constitutionally eligible to be President, tremendous efforts undertaken to prevent access to Obama’s past records, etc., etc.). If Obama is found ineligible to serve, the Communist Takeover Plot will unravel fast. All laws signed by Obama will be nullified. Then, once unraveled, we can pursue the relationships of all of George Soros’ commie organizations and prosecute all of the related criminal conspirators to the maximum extent of US law.
So don’t you think that when the GOP takes over one or both Houses of Congress in January, they ought to immediately ask Obama for proof of his eligibility to serve? If not, what does that tell you about who may be running the Republican Party? Maybe the takeover is further along than we think?


October 3, 2015


The gunman who opened fire at Oregon's Umpqua Community College singled out Christians, according to the father of a wounded student.

Before going into spinal surgery, Anastasia Boylan told her father the gunman entered her classroom firing.
"I've been waiting to do this for years," the gunman told the professor teaching the class. He shot him point blank, Boylan recounted.
Others were hit too, she told her family.
Everyone in the classroom dropped to the ground.
The gunman, while reloading his handgun, ordered the students to stand up and asked if they were Christians, Boylan told her family.
"And they would stand up and he said, 'Good, because you're a Christian, you're going to see God in just about one second,'" Boylan's father, Stacy, told CNN, relaying her account.
"And then he shot and killed them."

Verne Strickland: 
Want a hot story? How about one about a lone terrorist, reported to be a muslim (making him a jihadist), who somehow got twelve (count 'em) weapons, who hated Christians, plotted to kill them and did, identifying them by their answer to his question about their religion?

 Oh, yeah -- for our liberal media who despise Jesus, and Christianity, what a chance to play up a weird guy who achieved his most fervent wish to mock Christ, act on his hate, and do a big favor for Satan -- all in the space of less than ten minutes. Well, guys and gals, not many (perhaps none) of the MSM writers who covered the story seemed to want that honor. 

Any signs of a hate crime targeting Christians was buried deep in the copy -- marked "Forget about it." No sympathy here for the God people. Obama helped them ignore the truth by running like hell from the obvious, stated motives for the heinous crime. Oh, well, another day at the news office, wot? 

This is America, lest we forget.

Friday, October 2, 2015

Our Marxist President Will Not Resist -- and Our Enemies Know it.

 The 2 mega-ton gorilla in the room is the nuclear  first-strike option. 

  By Rick Kallieg  October 1, 2015

I believe we are living in the most dangerous time since the dropping of Fat Man and Little Boy. It isn't just because our military is being crippled by administrative cuts, decommissioning of our Naval fleets, reductions in active-duty troops, failure to maintain equipment, reductions in our Air power... not even the unilateral reductions in our nuclear arsenal.
We are living in the most dangerous time since Hiroshima and Nagasaki because we have a devout Marxist as President, who our enemies know will not lift a finger in effort to counter their strategic gains throughout the world; AND who have always wanted to see America destroyed. The extreme former communist-KGB turned uber fascist -- Vladimir Putin -- is pushing Obama around like a 200 lb. bully in middle-school does to scared little wimps willing to give up their lunch money for the illusion of safety.

I think -- and no one seems to want to talk about this (like race relations) -- the 2 mega-ton gorilla in the room is the nuclear first-strike option. We, America, are being out flanked by an unusual triumvirate of nations -- Russia, Iran and China. All want us out of the picture, all have failing economies and want global domination to control their own destinies, and all see America first and Israel second as the major impediment to their success.

That said, I believe it, more than ever, an option all three find at least in war-gaming, acceptable due to the extreme weakness of Barrack Obama, by which our will and maybe even ability to respond, has been severely compromised. And, if it appears to those nations that a real conservative such as Ted Cruz, might stand a better than even chance of getting elected next year -- it may seem even more tempting to rid themselves of us.
The fact is, accomplishing a nuclear attack upon the USA could be done without a massive high profile ICBM assault, just by providing the right weapons to the right terrorists, at the right time. Obama will, of course, be playing golf, in an area not designated as a target of their destruction.


Verne Strickland  Oct 2, 2015
To me, the main thing to come out of the mass slaying at Umpquah Community College was -- ten martyrs. That is undeniable.
The death list continues to grow hour by hour, but ten or more students were gunned down in cold blood after courageously identifying themselves as "Christian".

They could have denied Jesus Christ, but they didn't. They enter heaven as members of a select group -- martyrs.
Here is what Christ said about this: "Whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."
No mistaking the meaning of that. It is a stunning revelation. Jesus was not known for making casual statements. He spoke clearly and succinctly about the most important thing in our march from mortal life unto death -- where we will spend eternity. That's a long time.
I think about two types of victims who faced the shooter's rifle. A main group was Christian. The rest? Not Christian -- or so they said. This latter group, friends, did not know Jesus. They have spent their days on earth either ignoring or simply not being aware of the loving identity of the Son of God who created them.

For that -- at least for the moment -- they are dangerously adrift in an amoral vacuum. When they die, and die they surely will, they will have no Jesus to greet them on the other side, and thus will go to the spiritual dumping ground we describe as "hell".

Enough about the eternal for now.
The obvious delay in "admitting" that we have a grand religious quandary here is not surprising, but keenly, deeply disappointing. Our society and culture have become so totally screwed up that spiritual and religious designations have been demoted to the lowest possible consideration in our "modern" world.
This arbitrary ranking has the most obvious effect on the way such traumatic events are described by news media. Race seems to be the most important and thus the first mentioned. In every case there is the adversarial divide -- who committed an act of violence, and who was killed or wounded?
The most popular way to approach this is through racial definitions. If the assailant is white and the victim(s) black, we have a major news story, with implications regarding victimization and hate crime.
If the assailant is black and the victim(s) white, what's your problem? It is a shocking and revealing dilemma. We have a "dominant" race, achieved, oddly enough, by being part of a minority (whites are in the minority now -- a fact not willingly conceded by liberals.)
We've seen this go both ways. When a black is "breaking the law", the media stall and obfuscate. When it's a white in the same position, the fangs come out, and the race to vilify the alleged perpetrator is on.
But, drifting further from the types of situations we like to report on is the religious quagmire. Muslims are given a pass beginning with the top leadership rung -- the President. He clearly favors Islam and may even be a Muslim. He claims to be a Christian, but would have been the last man on earth to claim kinship with Jesus if quizzed about his deepest loyalties.
Dead givewaway. He looks on passively in the face of mass slaughter of Christians anywhere and everywhere in the world.
We all have our opinions here. I am especially incensed and embittered at Obama's curious attitudes in view of the fact that I am a Christian. I take this damned seriously. I don't trust or admire my president. I think he is wrong-headed and even un-American in his attitudes. I don't believe we have ever had a chief executive in our history so ambivalent -- and ineffective -- at discharging his duties.
I will follow the events in Oregon and in the Oval Office with aggressive interest and concentration. I don't expect any pleasant surprises from either. I do vow this -- there is no way that the sacrifice of the lives of these Christians will be ignored or pushed out of the news cycle.
These shocking developments have always been important to
Americans. Now this has become the Christian's battle first and foremost.
I have not done the job I would liked to have done on this. But I am a "lone wolf" reporter and commentator -- conservative, Christian, patriotic American. Under the circumstances and staffing shortage, I have done the best I could.
Verne Strickland October 2, 2015.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

A Government Shutdown and the Future of the Right-to-Life Movement

via Verne Strickland Facebook & USA DOT COM

A Government Shutdown and the Future of the Right-to-Life Movement

by Carol Tobias, PresidentNational Right to Life

File:Capitol Building Full View.jpg

WASHINGTON (September 18, 2015) – The government’s fiscal year begins on October 1. A lot of news stories are being written about whether or not the government will shut down on that day because members of Congress and pro-lifers want to defund Planned Parenthood.
We know that Planned Parenthood is a vile organization. It kills more than 300,000 innocent preborn children every year. The videos released this summer by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) have given us a unique opportunity because they exposed Planned Parenthood for its callous practices and the trafficking of body parts from aborted babies.
It makes sense that pro-lifers would want elected officials to take away every cent Planned Parenthood gets from tax-funded programs. Nobody wants to defund Planned Parenthood more than National Right to Life does.
The right-to-life movement now finds itself at a crucial crossroads.
There are two different roads that we can take. One is to insist that no more money go to Planned Parenthood and cause a government shutdown (which won’t result in actually defunding Planned Parenthood). The other is to take a slightly longer-term approach, taking advantage of the fact that we have the attention of the country as probably never before, laying the foundation to defund Planned Parenthood after we elect a pro-life president in 2016, by conducting hearings and passing a series of bills that will not only educate the American public about Planned Parenthood, but make members of Congress show, by their votes, if they support the largest abortion provider in the nation.
As a movement, we can only choose one of those roads. We must choose wisely, and we must choose quickly, because this unique window of opportunity will not last long.
So, the questions before us are: 1) how can we achieve our goal of defunding Planned Parenthood and educating the public about their massive abortion business; and 2) how can we avoid missteps that will actually hurt our efforts?
National Right to Life believes that the evidence points to the wisdom of taking the second road – namely, taking advantage of this chance to shine a light on Planned Parenthood and the entire abortion industry and educate the American public about their callous disregard for unborn babies and the women they purport to “help” through the sale of their deadly service.
Why do we believe this is the wisest road to take? Let’s look at some of the basic realities:
  • A September 9, 2015, Wall Street Journal editorial entitled “Obama and Clinton want a showdown over Planned Parenthood,” states, “[m]ost Americans know the organization [PP] as a women’s health clinic, not as the country’s largest abortion provider. The videos and Congressional hearings are slowly changing that public misperception, but a standoff that becomes a shutdown will inevitably focus the public on the shutdown, not the videos.” The column points to an August Quinnipiac poll, and recent history, showing that a shutdown would damage Republicans in Congress, not the Democrats or President Obama.
  • According to a Fox News poll, amazingly only 49% of American voters had either watched or heard of the CMP videos. Maybe a few more people have seen or heard of them since that poll, but too many Americans don’t even know what the fuss is about.
  • On September 14, CNN released results for a nationwide poll conducted September 4-8. That poll found 58% of respondents believe abortion should be illegal, or legal in only a few circumstances. (Those numbers showing a majority of Americans opposing the vast majority of abortions track with other polling conducted recently by Gallup and The Polling Company.) CNN asked another question of respondents about which is more important for Congress to do: “[a]pproving a budget agreement that would avoid a government shutdown” or “[e]liminating all federal funding for Planned Parenthood.” A large majority—71%—said it was more important for Congress to avoid a government shutdown. There is no category—age, gender, income, education, party or philosophical affiliation—that supported a government shutdown over defunding Planned Parenthood.
  • Additionally, as reported recently, a study by the Congressional Research Service found that the majority of federal funds flowing to Planned Parenthood would not even be temporarily interrupted if the government shut down over this issue, because the funds flow through “entitlement” programs such as Medicaid – and those entitlement programs do not do not depend on enactment of the annual funding bills.
It is also important to understand that federal spending bills do not include any “line items” that specifically designate money for Planned Parenthood. Rather, Planned Parenthood affiliates tap into funds from big programs like Medicaid and Title X. In order to deny Planned Parenthood such funds, a new law must be enacted to specifically prevent such funding. But for Congress to approve such a law will require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, to overcome the filibuster.
An August vote showed that at most, 55 senators are willing to defund Planned Parenthood. There is no evidence to suggest that any of the 45 senators who support Planned Parenthood will change their minds or that a government shutdown will convince at least five senators to switch their position. In reality, in a shutdown context there would be less than 55 votes against Planned Parenthood, not more.
There’s an alternate legislative process, known as “reconciliation,” that may provide a route by which the Senate could approve a partial cutoff of funds to abortion providers, by a simple majority vote. National Right to Life fully supports any such “reconciliation” strategy, which would not risk a government shutdown and the resulting political damage to our allies.
However, any bill—funding bill or reconciliation bill —can be vetoed. And that is exactly what will happen if any such bill that contains an anti-Planned Parenthood provision reaches the desk of President Obama. The grave reality is we currently have a pro-abortion ideologue occupying the Oval Office. There is no prospect whatever of achieving the two-thirds vote required to override a veto in either house of Congress, much less in both. The grim fact is this: in order to defund Planned Parenthood, we must have a pro-life president.
But, should the “battle” be fought anyway, even though it is a battle that President Obama cannot lose? That is the course that some commentators and some lawmakers are advocating. But let’s consider what could happen if Congress were to refuse to fund the federal government, in an attempt to defund Planned Parenthood.
President Obama issued a statement that he will veto the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, if passed by Congress. Obama’s subservience to the abortion lobby is so complete that he now threatens to use his pen to protect the abortionist who would kill a baby born alive, rather than to protect that helpless baby.
So yes, President Obama would be willing to shut down the government, take money away from the military, take money away from the national parks, and put millions of federal employees on leave. He will do anything and everything to keep that money flowing to Planned Parenthood.
How long would the government be shut down? Two weeks? Two months? Six months? 15 months? I do not believe that Obama will “cave” to demands to sign legislation that blocks funding for Planned Parenthood, no matter how long he has to wait for the situation to be resolved—especially since he knows that every day that shutdown continues, Republican approval numbers will sink in the polls.
At the same time, the mainstream media will not talk about Planned Parenthood killing unborn children, or the CMP videos. They will, instead, uncover every story to demonstrate how hurtful a government shutdown is to ordinary Americans—and how the blame lies with every pro-life Republican in Congress.
You will hear stories about children denied access to medical treatment or a military family unable to pay their bills or family vacations ruined because of national parks being closed. And will President Obama care about any of the stories that the press might uncover during a shut down? Absolutely not.
Every well-informed pro-lifer wants to defund Planned Parenthood. I want to defund Planned Parenthood. There are wonderful pro-life men and women in Congress who want to defund Planned Parenthood. And, certainly, National Right to Life wants to defund Planned Parenthood. The difference here is in strategy.
National Right to Life is looking at the bigger, long-term picture. We need a pro-life president who will work with us to take away the tax dollars that flow to this repulsive, immoral organization. We need a pro-life president who will appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will allow legislators to restore legal protections to unborn children. We need a pro-life president who will work hand-in-hand with the right-to-life movement to ensure that the most vulnerable members of our society are protected by our laws.
All of these goals are more easily and effectively achieved if the 71% of American voters opposed to a government shutdown aren’t angry at the pro-life candidates running for president.