Monday, November 9, 2015


By Verne Strickland  November 9, 2015

As a black spokesman for black students at the University of Missouri said tonight-- "Racism is systematic". I don't think that's what he meant to say. He apparently missed more than a few of his English classes.

This whole charade leaves a lot of questions, like -- "Why?" And "What the hell?" Throughout all he melodrama on campus, I never heard any relevant complaints substantiating the alleged "racism". One black campus leader said he "didn't feel welcome".

A graduate student -- (black unless otherwise identified) claimed he would continue his "hunger strike" until the end. What? I saw him in a CNN interview tonight, and the guy didn't look like he hadn't missed a meal in his life -- an obvious put-up job to fan flames of simmering racial tensions.

But if his starvation charade had worked, I think it should be put to a wider test on fat (obese?) black students who could definitely drop a few pounds without collapsing from malnutrition or even rickets. It's clear enough that the black kids are not suffering from a calorie shortage but from a terminal junk diet.

Back to the campus -- and the phony racial ruckus. It finally focused on the university football team, which as a "group" or more accurately a "gang", threatened to boycott the team and throw the next game if the college president didn't quit.

Hey -- whoa! All of these convoluted give-and-take threats cause one to question who is really holding the most marbles here. True, the football players are generating big bucks for the popular college gridiron contests. What are they getting in return? Coveted athletic scholarships, for one thing, through which they get a valuable education free of charge, plus other valuable perks.

It would seem that black young men, who otherwise may have been denied the chance to earn a degree at a top university, would consider that to be quite a handsome pay-off and a fair trade.

What else? Well, I heard it stated that only seven percent of the students at the university are black. Yet they quickly and confidently managed to wield leverage by blackmailing a top school which accorded them priceless career advantages.

The Tigers football players of color who surely have signed some kind of iron-clad lawyer- tested contracts, should be thrown off the team and off the campus for trying to hold this respected U.S. university hostage.

Things have gotten way out of hand here. Let's take control of the campus and its athletic programs back from the spoiled radicals and return it to the school trustees and the State government -- before these unruly and immature punks and punkesses really get out of hand.

Bottom line? This vaunted "diversity" thing ain't what it's cracked up to be, is it?


Nov. 9, 2015
Hillary Clinton: "I support President Obama Strongly"
"I find a lot of common ground with the Republican Party".
What the hell? This vixen is slithering around like the serpent in the Garden of Eden. She is smiling, but her eyes lie. I wouldn't trust her with any issue of substance.
Vetting is the issue right now that we need to look at. Bill Clinton was not vetted satisfactorily, and look at what we got. A socialist Democrat not even characterized as socialist when he ran for U.S. president. He led us disastrously astray.
He is married to Hillary Clinton, who wants to pick up where Bill Clinton left off. Bill and Hillary are both connected with numerous mysterious deaths of people who were investigating them for fraud and other spurious activities. But "vetted"? No.
Which brings me to Dr. Ben Carson. The dominant U.S. media (traditionally left-leaning, and now to the point of anti-American socialist loyalties) are beginning to zero in on Carson. For what? Embellishing his resume, beating up little black boys with baseball bats (suggestions not substantiated by his own childhood acquaintances) and other trivia.
But where's the meat and 'taters? They'll have to come up with more than that to build the deep distrust against the brilliant neurosurgeon that they are really after.
The whole vetting game is so porous and shoddy as to be totally irrelevant. But it's so vital to discerning who's who in the jockeying for those who have occupied the Oval Office -- and others who want to be next.
We are as vulnerable in this all-important determination as we are in keeping ISIS in check. And I'm far from convinced that we are accomplishing that.
Warning: I put this together in a hurry, so may be installing some edits to it. In the meantime -- keep my post out of the reach of children and do not store at temperatures above 70 degrees Fahrenheit. Celsius? Don't worry. Scientists still haven't figured out what this actually means. I think it's some sort of elitist European one-world political movement.