Saturday, December 8, 2012

Terrorist organization "inherits" U.S. war gear, courtesy of Obama.


Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 9, 2012

Facebook Sharing


Our tax dollars hard at work supporting terrorism. The United States is sending more battle tanks and jet fighters to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood- dominated government.

Right now, Egypt is due 200 M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, the same mechanized firepower manned by American soldiers, bringing Egypt’s inventory to a robust 1,200. Also in the pipeline is a squadron of the Air Force F-16 Falcon, a multipurpose warplane able to dogfight and drop ordnance.

The government awarded Lockheed Martin Corp. a contract in March 2010 for 20 F-16s, the last to be delivered next year. That would increase Egypt’s total fleet to 240, according to a company press release at the time. The billions of dollars in U.S. military aid — in annual $1.3 billion stipends — have made the Egyptian air force the fourth-largest F-16 operator among 25 countries. Egypt’s 4,000 tanks, including the 1,000 or so M1A1s, make it the world’s seventh-largest tank army.

All of this despite the fact that Morsi has decreed near-absolute power for himself and his supporters and opponents battle outside his palace.

In addition, Egypt’s military buildup presents risks for Washington — and Israel — with the growing influence of the Brotherhood, whose overriding goal is to establish Shariah, or Islamic, law worldwide.

A Pentagon statement to The Washington Times on Thursday said: “We are always reviewing our foreign assistance to make sure foreign assistance advances U.S. objectives and is being used for the right purposes.”

Thanks President Obama for your undying loyalty and support of Islam and its most devout followers and supporters of terrorism, The Muslim Brotherhood. With friends like you in high places and our tax dollars, they are certain to succeed in their mission of world domination.

By the way….. isn’t aiding and abetting the enemy, TREASON?

Read more at The Washington Times :#ixzz2EO8rWiBT

Libya attack report imminent, John Kerry says

 Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 7, 2012

 



Libya Attack 
By DONNA CASSATA 12/07/12 03:58 PM ET EST AP
Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) (R), and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) (L) participate in a news conference with people who have disabilities on Capitol Hill, December 3, 2012 in Washington, DC. Sen. Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) urged fellow Senators to approve the 'Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities bill, an international agreement for protecting the rights of individuals with disabilities. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON -- Sen. John Kerry says Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has agreed to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about an independent report on the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya.
In a letter Friday to the panel's members, Kerry indicated that the report from the accountability review board headed by retired diplomat Thomas Pickering is imminent. The Massachusetts Democrat and committee chairman says he's asked that Pickering and retired Adm. Mike Mullen appear before the committee before Clinton. Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is a member of the review board.
The attack on the consulate in Benghazi killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Clinton has also agreed to testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Friday, December 7, 2012

Clinton to testify on Benghazi attack report -- U.S. lawmaker

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 7, 2012


 











WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will testify on a report expected to be released next week on the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, a top Republican lawmaker said on Friday.

"I have just received confirmation from Secretary Clinton's office that the secretary of state will appear before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs to discuss, in an open hearing, the findings and the recommendations in the report," Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said in a statement.

Ros-Lehtinen is chair of the House of Representatives Foreign Relations Committee, which has already held several hearings and classified briefings on the attack.

The attack killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, and raised questions about the adequacy of security in far-flung posts.

Republicans have criticized the Obama administration for its flawed early public explanations of the attack, and then for shifting explanations of why talking points given to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice were changed to delete a reference to al Qaeda.

Ros-Lehtinen said she expected an accountability review board report on the attack to be released next week.

She said she wanted to hear from Clinton about steps the State Department has taken to deal with problems in the "security of our posts, threat assessments, host government responsibilities and coordination with other U.S. security agencies."

The committee's press release did not give a date for the hearing with Clinton but said it expected to happen "soon after" the review board's report is released.

(Reporting by Doug Palmer; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Right-to-work bills are rays of sunshine for Michigan -- and all of America.

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 7, 2012

The House and Senate each passed bills on the same day they were introduced that give private and public sector workers the right to avoid paying union dues in an organized workplace. Only police officers and firefighters would be exempt.
The package can't reach final completion until at least Tuesday because of procedural rules that require a five-day layover for two of the bills before they can be voted on in the other chamber.
That gives opponents more time to lobby against the legislation, like they did Thursday starting in the early morning when word spread the bills would be introduced, to late evening when the Senate finally adjourned.
The historic legislation passed over the thunderous chanting from thousands of workers who descended on the Capitol, resulting in at least eight arrests and a temporary lockdown of the building by Michigan State Police. Democrats in both chambers staged walkouts and procedural maneuvers to stall passage while workers protested in and outside the Capitol.
"Young people don't know the history of labor relations," said Diane Petryk, a union member from Lansing. "They have an eight-hour day, a weekend, vacation and more because of labor unions.
"Their grandparents died on the picket lines in Flint, Detroit and other places so that we could have a middle class."
The Legislature's votes make Michigan the latest focal point in a national debate over unions — pitting Republicans against Democrats, workers against employers and business interests against many in the middle class who believe right to work will roll back gains made over decades in wages, benefits and working conditions.
Six Republicans in the House and four in the Senate voted against the bills.
Thursday's actions also come a month after voters defeated a statewide referendum that would have enshrined collective bargaining rights in the state constitution. Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer, D-East Lansing, denied the November vote was a mandate for right to work.
Conservatives lauded the move.
Glenn Spencer, vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Workforce Freedom Initiative, in a press release, said: "Workers in Michigan should not have to choose between financially supporting a union or losing their jobs."
Michigan Chamber President and CEO Rich Studley issued a statement saying: "Passage of this legislation will help create and retain jobs and improve our state's economic competitiveness."
But it was condemned by supporters of union rights, including Whitmer. She pledged to obstruct what she called an "abomination" and "cowardly act" by Republicans, vowing to use every parliamentary tool available to bottleneck the legislation.
In the Senate, Democrats attached numerous amendments to the bill, hoping to stall its progress. Each — including one to rename the bill the Randy Richardville Right to Work Act, after the Senate majority leader — was defeated.
President Barack Obama reiterated his opposition to right-to-work legislation, saying he believes the economy is "stronger when workers get good wages and good benefits," and he opposes attempts to roll back their rights.
White House spokesman Keith Maley said Michigan workers' role in helping revive the U.S. auto industry shows "how unions have helped build a strong middle class and a strong American economy."

'About breaking unions'

"This bill is not about giving people choice. This bill is about breaking unions," said Rep. Steven Lindberg, D-Marquette. "When we do, the people in this state and in my district are going to be so much poorer."
About 2,000 labor supporters had gathered at the Capitol by midafternoon.
They took over the Capitol steps and tore down a banner of Michigan Freedom Fund, a group that aired statewide radio and TV ads this week seeking passage of the bill.
"The working families are not going to lie down and watch their state go in a negative direction," said UAW President Bob King outside the Capitol. "Every right-to-work state in America has lower wages, lower benefits, greater income inequality, more discrimination, less equality in the workplace. Right to work is wrong for Michigan."
At one point, there were so many protesters that Michigan State Police ordered the Capitol closed and no one was allowed to enter or leave either chamber.
Democrats sought a court order to reopen the doors, and eventually a judge agreed. That created a minor problem in the House, where Democratic members went outside to welcome in protesters, but found themselves locked out of the House chamber.
"I came out to escort the citizens back into their house … and I was denied re-entry," said state Rep. Vicki Barnett, D-Farmington Hills. She got back in after calling a staff member.
Democrats were upset about how quickly the Republican leadership moved the bills. There were no committee hearings and the bills were instead moved directly to the floor for votes.
"This is not right," said House Democratic Floor Leader Kate Segal, D-Battle Creek.
In a meeting with reporters, House Speaker Jase Bolger, R-Marshall, downplayed questions about the lack of a public hearing on the legislation.
"This issue has been discussed in this session for almost two years now, and it's been discussed in Michigan for decades," he said.
Snyder added: "This topic has been out there for a significant amount of time."
House Republicans have a 64-46 majority and need 56 votes to pass the bills. In January, when the new legislative session begins, the GOP majority will be reduced to 59-51 following the results of the November election.
"You're doing this in lame duck because you know next session you won't have the votes," said Rep. Brandon Dillon, D-Grand Rapids.
A few Republican representatives stood on the House floor and defended the legislation as giving workers a choice about financially backing a labor union.
"Unions will have the same rights as before, but now workers will have them too," said state Rep. Greg MacMaster, R-Kewadin.
In arguing against the concept of a right-to-work law, Democrats and labor union members compared forcing nonunion workers to pay unions agency fees for collective bargaining benefits to different forms of collective membership.
Rep. Tim Bledsoe, D-Grosse Pointe, said during floor debate that there are "compulsory" fees levied on cattle producers and dairy farmers to generate revenue to market their products.
"Let's keep these arguments for economic freedom in perspective," he said. "Compulsory workplace fees are not all that uncommon."

'Freedom to choose'

Snyder said Thursday morning at a packed news conference at his office in the Romney building across from the Capitol that he wanted the Legislature to act quickly on the bills and that he would sign them.
The Legislature is scheduled to adjourn by Dec. 20, but Republicans were hoping to leave town as early as Dec. 13.
Snyder has long said right-to-work legislation hasn't been on his agenda, but he changed his view because of Indiana's February passage of a right-to-work law and increased political pressure to pass the bill in the Legislature's lame-duck session.
"Workers should have freedom to choose who they associate with," Snyder said.
The law would apply broadly to the 17.5 percent of Michigan's workforce that works in unionized workplaces, but contains an exemption for firefighters and police officers, Snyder said, to be consistent with state law for binding arbitration.
Bolger said the legislation would include an appropriation of state money to pay for implementation. Attaching an appropriation to legislation is a legislative mechanism to prevent voter-initiated repeals of legislation.
The Legislature will not put the law into effect immediately, so it wouldn't take effect until April 1, Richardville said.
kbouffard@detnews.com
(517) 371-3660
Detroit News Staff Writers David Shepardson and Tony Briscoe contributed.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 "A date that will live in infamy". Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- Payback.





By Verne Strickland, December 7, 2012

I had the great fortune during my sixteen years on the air at WRAL-TV in Raleigh to get in a considerable amount of international travel, visiting over thirty countries on U.S, trade and reverse investment missions.

A favorite destination was Japan, which I visited a dozen times or more during that period. I personally enjoyed the Japanese experience, studied the Japanese language at N.C. State, and produced some films through the auspices of the NC/Japan Society on campus.

Unfortunately, my ardor has cooled toward that society and culture in the intervening years.

One damper has been by virtue of a great opportunity which has come my way -- to collaborate on a project with an extraordinary friend and documentary film producer at Research Triangle Park -- Scott Long.

Scott has won the rights to co-produce a full-length docu-drama on the exploits of the legendary Flying Tigers, aerial aces in China's war against the invading Japanese in the late years of World War II. Scott has asked me to write the script for this film, and I am very excited about the opportunity.

Accounts of the savagery with which Japan's military attacked Chinese civilians in Hunan Province is at first hard to comprehend. Then we Americans remember Pearl Harbor -- a date "that will live in infamy."

The December 7 sneak attack on the peaceful Hawaiian islands brought America into the war against Japan, and that bloody conflict cost the lives of countless Americans and our allies, and of the Japanese aggressors.

During my trips to Japan, I was asked on a number of occasions if I wished to visit Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Each time I declined -- for patriotic reasons. I refused to be brought into a situation where misty-eyed Japanese -- yes, and cynical, arrogant American expatriates -- would attempt to shame me over our use of the atomic bombs employed by American bombers to force the Japanese into unconditional surrender, essentially ending hostilities in the Pacific theater.




I did not -- and do not -- feel shame or regret over that supreme victory over the Japanese. To me, Hiroshima and Nakasaki are merely exclamation points that ended a war that Japan triggered by its own disgrace. The bombs snuffed out two big Japanese cities in a heartbeat, but spared an estimated one million American lives that surely would have been sacrificed by taking that country by using conventional forces.

That not only is a fair trade-off as far as I am concerned -- it is clear and convincing payback. And no nation could deserve it more than Japan.

As the legendary Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto intoned with dread during that onerous attack: "I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant." Boy did he have that right.

So, in Verne's book, Pearl Harbor was the fire that started the Pacific war, but the all-consuming flames from our atomic explosions over Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended it.

I hate to say it so bluntly -- but in those by-gone days when America found itself in harm's way due to powerful foreign enemies, we put on big boots and kicked the hell out of the attackers. Would that we had such a no-nonsense philosophy today. And no malevolent and belligerent United Nations to tell us how to manage our own affairs.

As December 7, 2012, approached this week, I spotted a related story about Japan's attempt to assign guilt over "the bomb" incident. It relates the experience of Clifton Truman Daniel, 55, eldest grandson of former president Harry Truman -- Give 'em hell Harry -- who gave the fateful nod that loosed the atomic age over Japan in 1945. I admire the President's courageous decision, which he made apparently with no second-guesses.

In August of this year, Truman Daniel made a personal visit to Japan -- and to the two cities whose fates intersected with the most powerful weapon ever utilized to this date in history. His trip to Japan was not welcomed by all, he said.

“There are those in Japan who are still very angry about the bombings,” Daniel said.
“Most people would tell me ‘We appreciate your coming.’ But some of the meetings with survivors were very emotional.”

Following the Nagasaki ceremony, a French journalist asked Daniel, again, why he had come.
“I said the trip was about reconciliation and healing,” he said. “I didn’t try to duck anything, but neither was I going apologize for my grandfather. He never did, first of all, and the country has not.
“But I can still reach out to these people.”

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/11/23/4434571/truman-grandson-plants-seeds-of.html#storylink=cpy

And the Truman family spokesman disclosed another reaction -- this from Americans who were awaiting an amphibious assault on the Japanese mainland.

Said young Thuman, "Over the years I have shaken the hands of dozens of American survivors of World War II, veterans who have told me ‘I wouldn’t be alive if your grandfather had not dropped that bomb,’ ”

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/11/23/3683477/truman-grandson-plants-seeds-of.html#storylink=cpy





Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/11/23/4434571/truman-grandson-plants-seeds-of.html#storylink=c“Over the years I have shaken the hands of dozens of American survivors of World War II, veterans who have told me ‘I wouldn’t be alive if your grandfather had not dropped that bomb,’ ” he said.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/11/23/4434571/truman-grandson-plants-seeds-of.html#storylink=cpy



Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Stocks to drop 90%, 50% unemployment, 100% annual inflation, starting in 2013. Happy New Year!

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 5, 2012

 

Tuesday, 04 Dec 2012 11:09 PM
By Newsmax Wires
Share:

“The data is clear: 50% unemployment, a 90% stock market drop, and 100% annual inflation . . . starting in 2013.”

These were the prophetic words spoken to Aaron DeHoog, Financial Publisher of Newsmax Media, by famed economist and New York Times best-selling author Robert Wiedemer, at a private dinner in Palm Beach, Fla.

“You see, the medicine will become the poison,” Wiedemer continued, as he pulled a worn manila envelope from his briefcase.

Skeptical of his claims at first, DeHoog was convinced when Wiedemer showed him the chilling evidence using five indisputable charts ().



The very next day, Wiedemer stopped by DeHoog’s office to record an interview for an invitation-only audience explaining how America got itself into this mess, and how this select group could find safe, secure investments during these tumultuous times.

Unfortunately, many media outlets have banned Wiedemer’s video, labeling it too controversial. Some have called it “The Video That Will Get Obama Fired,” but that was never Wiedemer’s intention.

He does, however, unapologetically name those who paved this road to perdition.

Wiedemer says the blame lies squarely on those whose job it was to avoid the exact situation we find ourselves in, including current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Chairman Alan Greenspan, tasked with preventing financial meltdowns and keeping the nation’s economy strong through monetary and credit policies.

At one point, Wiedemer even calls out Bernanke, saying that his “money from heaven will be the path to hell.”

The interview has become a wake-up call for those unprepared (or unwilling) to acknowledge an ugly truth: The country’s financial “rescue” devised in Washington has failed miserably.

But it’s not just the grim predictions that are causing the sensation in Wiedemer’s video interview. Rather, it’s his comprehensive blueprint for economic survival that’s really commanding global attention. (It has now been seen over 40 million times.)

DeHoog believes the interview offers realistic, step-by-step solutions that the average hard-working American can easily follow.

“People were sitting up and taking notice, and they begged us to make the interview public so they could easily share it,” DeHoog said.

Asked if he was concerned that Wiedemer might be wrong about his predictions, DeHoog commented, “Absolutely not. Our real concern is this — what if only half of Wiedemer’s predictions come true?

“That’s a scary thought for sure. We want the average American to be prepared, and that is why we will continue to push this video to as many outlets as we can. We want the word to spread.”



Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Under deal, debt to rise $12 trillion -- but 95% of network stories leave that out.


Verne Strickland Blogmaster / December 5, 2012