Thursday, December 12, 2013

THAT PHOTO . . . ONE GREAT MAN HONORED. ANOTHER AT PLAY.

The story behind "that selfie" -- a testy clash of cultures. Never the twain shall meet (I don't think.)


(AFP Photo / Roberto Schmidt)
US President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron pose for a picture with Denmark's Prime Minister Helle Thorning Schmidt next to US First Lady Michelle Obama during the memorial service for South African former president Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg. (AFP Photo / Roberto Schmidt)
 
Cliquez pour la version française By Roberto Schmidt

So here’s the photo, my photo, which quickly lit up the world’s social networks and news websites. The “selfie” of three world leaders who, during South Africa’s farewell to Nelson Mandela, were messing about like kids instead of behaving with the mournful gravitas one might expect.
In general on this blog, photojournalists tell the story behind a picture they’ve taken. I’ve done this for images from Pakistan, and India, where I am based. And here I am again, but this time the picture comes from a stadium in Soweto, and shows people taking a photo of themselves. I guess it’s a sign of our times that somehow this image seemed to get more attention than the event itself. Go figure.

Anyway, I arrived in South Africa with several other AFP journalists to cover the farewell and funeral ceremonies for Nelson Mandela. We were in the Soccer City stadium in Soweto, under a driving rain. I’d been there since the crack of dawn and when I took this picture, the memorial ceremony had already been going on for more than two hours.
From the podium, Obama had just qualified Mandela as a “giant of history who moved a nation towards justice." After his stirring eulogy, America’s first black president sat about 150 metres across from where I was set up. He was surrounded by other foreign dignitaries and I decided to follow his movements with the help of my 600 mm x 2 telephoto lens.
So Obama took his place amid these leaders who’d gathered from all corners of the globe. Among them was British Prime Minister David Cameron, as well as a woman who I wasn’t able to immediately identify. I later learned it was the Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning Schmidt. I’m a German-Colombian based in India, so I don’t feel too bad I didn’t recognize her! At the time, I thought it must have been one of Obama’s many staffers.
Anyway, suddenly this woman pulled out her mobile phone and took a photo of herself smiling with Cameron and the US president. I captured the scene reflexively. All around me in the stadium, South Africans were dancing, singing and laughing to honour their departed leader. It was more like a carnival atmosphere, not at all morbid. The ceremony had already gone on for two hours and would last another two. The atmosphere was totally relaxed – I didn’t see anything shocking in my viewfinder, president of the US or not. We are in Africa.

Note from Verne:

The man who took that picture, and others, is Roberto Schmidt of AFP Photo. You've see Schmidt's photos, and heard something about the big shemozzle that has erupted as a result.

I have my own thoughts about it all -- when have I not? So I felt compelled, despite possible vehement objections, to have a go at it myself.

Somehow it seemed to me to be provocative to feature just one of the frames extraordinaire, with a gaggle of comments they elicited. I think this is funny, and edifying:

  • 1 From trudi - 11/12/2013, 13:32
    Hello I am a journalist at BBC radio in the UK - would you be wiling to do a quick phone interview about this please this afternoon - please email trudy.barber@bbc.co.uk thanks

  • 2 From OrangeMoon - 11/12/2013, 13:32
    How to alienate and irritate Africans: "The atmosphere was totally relaxed – I didn’t see anything shocking in my viewfinder, president of the US or not. We are in Africa."
    Whatever do you mean? Nothing like some subliminal racism thrown in to give 'context' to your story. Totally unnecessary and offensive.

  • 3 From Nicolas Congote - 11/12/2013, 13:39
    Roberto, es Nicolás Congote de EL TIEMPO en Colombia, cómo puedo contactarte para hablar sobre tu trabajo. Mi correo es niccon@eltiempo.com. Abrazo. (** I think this was from the clueless signer for the deaf.)

  • 4 From Lily Yamamoto - 11/12/2013, 13:41
    No comment. it very natural, at least is a happy farewell ceremony to Mandiba. I am sure he wouldn't mind at all. Let us pray; may he soul rest in peace in heaven with Lord. Amen

  • 5 From zizi - 11/12/2013, 14:08
    A picture worth a thousand words!

  • 7 From Kathy - 11/12/2013, 14:14
    No problem the photo was taken, but those three looked childish, no more no less, but that's a shame from world leaders. However, from Cameron it is normal behaviour.

  • 9 From kayhag - 11/12/2013, 14:35
    Thanks so much for your important work, and for this context. The absurd obsession with the superficial = "please distract us from pondering the meaning of Mandela to our own lives and to those who represent and govern us."
    Thanks again.

  • 10 From EmC - 11/12/2013, 14:45
    Well said. I think Madiba would be laughing if he saw the image! He was a very relaxed and down to earth person. This hullabaloo about the selfie is mis-directed attention. In my opinion its only fitting that dignitaries of this caliber felt relaxed enough to take a selfie at Madiba's memorial.
  • 11 From Peter du Toit - 11/12/2013, 14:52 

    Thank you for giving the context! "All around me in the stadium, South Africans were dancing, singing and laughing to honour their departed leader. It was more like a carnival atmosphere, not at all morbid." Which is exactly why they felt they could also relax!
  • 12 From Peter Hjelmbak - 11/12/2013, 15:07
    Fantastic photo - 1 in a billion. I have been defending that photo for the whole day. And I love the story behind it, that I just read! I think it is great and I think Mr. Mandela would have loved that picture! Black/white, woman/man - all equal, having fun and a great laugh. That is the kind of leaders I want to rule the world and NOT some angry old white men, hiding in a dark room! GREAT lets have some more REAL people and not stressed out politicians!

  • 13 From Ayo - 11/12/2013, 15:15
    I was totally with you, until the offensive "We are in Africa." What do you mean by "We are in Africa"? Do you even realize what you just wrote? Ways to insult a whole continent!!! I totally lost respect for you. Yet I am almost sure that you lack the intellectual sophistication to comprehend the offensive nature of that statement. This is so pathetic.

  • 15 From Guest - 11/12/2013, 15:20
    Can you explain why Obama and Michelle ended up switching seats?

  • 16 From Ana Pessoa - 11/12/2013, 15:57 
     Obama, Cameron and the beautiful blonde are not mere mortals.
    They are representatives of their countries, representatives of a people, of millions. There is a protocol - respect and dignity - when we go to the last farewell of a man. Especially when this man was huge. The selfie shows a normal attitude at the wrong time.The press is correct in questioning this attitude.

  • 17 From Scott - 11/12/2013, 15:58
    @OrangeMan and @Ayo: "We are in Africa" is not an insult.
    Mr. Schmidt was explaining the context of the memorial service. As he said, it was a four hour celebration with jubilant crowds, music, and dancing.
    No one would memorialize a national leader that way in the US, UK, or Denmark, where the custom is to be somber and quiet during memorial services. But this celebration was not held in the US, UK, or Denmark. It was held in Africa, and South Africans are entitled to memorialize Mr. Mandela as they believe he would want to be remembered.
    Anyone attending should NOT be judged though the lens of a somber Western memorial service. This was not that kind of service. This was a celebration, a celebration that was proudly and unapologetically [South] African.

  • 20 From Yoreney - 11/12/2013, 16:01
    when i saw the picture i thought Michelle Obama looked pissed because they were taking a selfie without her. Then I saw another picture. This time Mr Obama was kissing her hand, and it really looked like he was apologizing for taking that selfie without her. LOL.

  • 21 From Guest - 11/12/2013, 16:02
    Anybody there complaining about "we are in Africa" being racist: I don't see why! the context in which he puts the statement clearly indicates that he wants to point out this is the way Africans part from their beloved ones. I can't imagine people behaving that way in America, Europe, Asia, Australia, although I may be wrong. But I fail to see where he insults anybody. I think this is a great article!

  • 40 From Belloc - 11/12/2013, 17:04
    Respect for the dead has nothing to do with this. The dead communist Mandela deserves no more public decorum than the burnt corpse of Goebbels. It's about the tastelessness of two middle age clowns in positions of responsibility going ga-ga over a hottie, and one of them in front of his wife. It might be Africa, but in America not to mention Britain, such buffoonish behavior on such an occasion is deemed disrespectful and juvenile. And Obama is after all American...isn't he?

    Verne: So, the ballots are in -- a scattered few hanging chads, but aside from that natural deficiency, it's clear who's thinking what.

    And what do I think? Well, I think that, if we can't agree on stuff like this, let's see what the U.N. can do with the issue. Check that. They haven't done anything with any issue. Looks like we're still stuck.

    But I do think Obama showed disrespect for Mandela -- based on normal, acceptable behavior at a memorial service in America, Great Britain, or Denmark. Which is where I feel comfortable. 

Friday, November 29, 2013

New aggressive strain of HIV discovered -- develops into AIDS more quickly

  FoxNews.com
Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Nov 29 2013
  • HIV CDC.jpg
    Scanning electron micrograph of HIV-1 budding from cultured lymphocyte. The multiple round bumps on cell surface represent sites of assembly and budding of virions. (CDC.gov)
Researchers have discovered a new, more aggressive strain of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that develops into AIDS much more quickly than other strains, Medical News Today reported.

In a new study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, scientists detailed the new strain as a “recombinant” virus – a hybrid of two virus strains. Called A3/02 – a cross between the 02AG and A3 viruses – the strain can develop into AIDS in just five years after first infection – one of the shortest time periods for HIV-1 types.

"Recombinants seem to be more vigorous and more aggressive than the strains from which they developed,” said first author Angelica Palm, a doctoral candidate at Lund University in Sweden.

So far, the A3/02 strain has only been seen in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, but other studies have shown that recombinants are spreading more quickly across the globe.

"HIV is an extremely dynamic and variable virus. New subtypes and recombinant forms of HIV-1 have been introduced to our part of the world, and it is highly likely that there are a large number of circulating recombinants of which we know little or nothing,” said senior author Patrik Medstran, professor of clinical virology at Lund University. “We therefore need to be aware of how the HIV-1 epidemic changes over time."

Coming soon to a population center near you. 

Monday, November 25, 2013

PRO GOLFER JEFF COCHRAN TERMINATED BY SPONSOR FOR SPEAKING OPENLY OF FAITH IN CHRIST -- AND SUPPORT FOR GLENN BECK.

Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Nov 25 2013

Nebraska Golf Card withdrew sponsorship because golfer “believes he has been forgiven for past indiscretions by a mystical power who lives in the clouds.”




An appreciation for Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz and a well-known Bible verse appears to be the main reasons an aspiring professional golfer was abruptly cut off from his main source of income by his sponsor.

The golfer’s name is Jeff Cochran and until a few weeks ago, it appeared that he may have finally gotten the big break that would help him achieve his goal of having a shot to play on golf’s elite PGA tour. 

Cochran claims he was contracted in January by Virginia-based businessman Brian McMahon to help promote Nebraska Golf Card (NGC), a budding promotional operation that says it’s “designed to give golfers reduced rates and access to private clubs.”

Author’s note: Golf Card International is not affiliated with Nebraska Golf Card.
 
After playing most of the year for Nebraska Golf Card, Cochran alleged his sponsorship was abruptly terminated. The initial reason given seemed quite surprising — his support for Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz; Cruz’s father, Raphael; and Glenn Beck — but faith, and specifically a Bible verse, also played a big part in the termination of the contract.

The verse in question? Philippians 4:13, which reads, ” I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”

Pro Golfer Jeff Cochran Loses Sponsorship Because He Likes Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz and God

This is how Jeff Cochran’s favorite Bible verse appears on all of his golf bags.
In late October, Cochran, his agent David Reynolds and NGC’s Brian McMahon both claim they were at a dinner and the conversation turned to Cruz. Cochran says he praised Cruz and his father, Raphael, mentioning that he had seen the elder Cruz on an episode of “The Glenn Beck Program.”

Cochran told TheBlaze that his sponsor was taken aback by this statement and was also troubled by the fact that his business associate was a fan of Beck. Following his pro-Cruz statement, Cochran said McMahon asked him, ”Would you be willing to give up our support to stand with that wackjob (Beck)?” Cochran answered “yes” and said the dinner continued without any additional tension or drama.

But the next morning, Cochran’s agent said, he received an email from NGC announcing that it was pulling all financial and product support from Cochran.

Pro Golfer Jeff Cochran Loses Sponsorship Because He Likes Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz and God
Image source: David Reynolds

The email, a copy of which was provided to TheBlaze, demanded immediate return of all equipment and that Cochran stop using their logo as well. The initial email from McMahon to Cochran’s agent was quite specific as to the reason for the split (emphasis added):
David, I have never had an issue with you or really Jeff for that matter, but this situation is very disturbing. I have been tolerant of his religious views and even supported his off course speaking. However, I just can’t allow my company to be associated with these radical political views. The idea that Jeff would line up with the likes of Glenn Beck or Ted Cruz or any other individual interested in destroying America, just isn’t something I can swallow.
Cochran and Reynolds said they immediately complied with the demand and returned the equipment, they told TheBlaze. That quick response triggered the email thank-you from McMahon shown below, but that note also contained a few parting shots (emphasis added).

“I looked up the verse Jeff put on the bag and had to laugh,” the email said. ”How can someone so smart be so gullible? The idea of trusting or believing that someone has control over your future is the definition of insanity. I will continue to trust people I’ve actually met and trust to help chart my course.”

Pro Golfer Jeff Cochran Loses Sponsorship Because He Likes Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz and God

Image source: David Reynolds
McMahon’s email continued (emphasis added): “Tell Jeff if he ever decides to relinquish these childish and uneducated views, we might be willing to renew our relationship.” He ended the email, “In me I trust, Brian.”
It was shortly after the second email was sent that Cochran and his agent reached out to TheBlaze.
“Believes he has been forgiven for past indiscretions by a mystical power who lives in the clouds.”

Share:
TheBlaze was in the process of investigating the story, exchanging emails with Cochran and his agent and establishing a timeline of the events, when we received an unsolicited email from McMahon of NGC (from the same email address that sent the emails to Cochran’s address).

McMahon did not mince his words and almost immediately attacked TheBlaze, writing, “I spent a little time on your website this morning and you should be ashamed of what you’ve created.”

He didn’t hold back, mocking Cochran for listening to Beck: “Jeff is the perfect target for someone like Beck. He believes he has been forgiven for past indiscretions by a mystical power who lives in the clouds, so why wouldn’t he be gullible (sic) enough for the Tea Baggers.”

The email closed with a particularly angry and personal attack on Beck (emphasis added): “He is a lousy drunk who should be led to the nearest border, given a big toss and told to never return. And if he hates the government as much as he says, that should be a welcome event for him too.”

Friday, November 15, 2013

Muslim Saveeda Warsi / British Parliament: Christian minorities 'endangered' in Middle East



Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Nov 16 2013

http://shariaunveiled.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/christian-persecution-begins.jpgNovember 16, 2013 at 12:12am  BBC

Christianity is at risk of extinction in some parts of the world due to growing persecution of minority communities, a Muslim minister has warned.
Baroness Warsi said Christians were in danger of being driven out of countries, such as Syria and Iraq, where the religion first took root.

Syria's civil war and the instability in Iraq has seen many leave.
Baroness Warsi said politicians had a duty to speak out against persecution and appeal for religious tolerance.

In a speech at Georgetown University in Washington DC, the foreign officer minister - who also has responsibility for faith communities - said one in ten Christians were living in countries where they were in a minority.

Baroness Warsi

Full title  The Rt Hon. the Baroness Warsi

Name  Sayeeda Warsi

Party/group Conservative, British Parliament



'Seen as other'

She told that the BBC that in some cases, Christians were being targeted for "collective punishment" by majority groups in retaliation for what they perceive as the injustices committed by Western powers.

"I am concerned that the birthplace of Christianity, those parts of the world where Christianity first spread, is now seeing large sections of the Christian community leaving and those that are remaining feeling persecuted," she told Radio 4's 'Today'.

"Tragically, what's happening is they are being seen as newcomers, being portrayed as an 'other' within that society, even though they have existed there for many, many centuries," she said.

The Conservative peer said Christians were seen as "legitimate targets" over the perceived actions of their co-religionists.

"This concept of collective punishment and them being seen as agents of the West or agents of regimes is wrong," she added.

"We need to speak out and raise this with the countries where this is happening."
Religious pluralism made countries stronger in a whole variety of ways, she said, from broadening the range of educational opportunities to injecting economic dynamism.

'Political will'

Baroness Warsi, who was Britain's first female Muslim cabinet minister said she had already had "very frank conversations" with ministers in Pakistan, telling them senior politicians must set a standard for tolerance.

"Politicians do have a responsibility to set the tone, to mark out legal parameters as to what will and will not be tolerated."

She added: "There's an international consensus, in the form of a Human Rights Council resolution on the treatment of minorities and tolerance towards other faiths. But we need to build political will behind that.

"Of course there have been moments when religious communities have been in conflict, but there have also been great moments of co-existence between faiths. There isn't an intrinsic clash between different faiths."

The minister has previously warned about the dangers of "militant secularisation" in the UK.

The leader of the Catholic Church in England and Wales said he agreed that the very existence of Christianity was under threat in some parts of the Middle East.
"There are real challenges for Christians in this part of the world to support and get alongside them and also for politicians to understand that the presence of Christians is a great mediating factor, often for example between different segments of Islam," the Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols told 'Today'.
  • Verne Strickland

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Democrats are Racist. How Long Will the Black Community Put Up With This?

  Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Nov 13 2013

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDbrjuet-Ax4s0rQqKbQ9LgfvEuWw95uRWOuFZ73HLe5NuVkxOMLPNSjjBKiGtYFa99GgXYOnIotzn6T5wMPDHVhg2lFrsOerozRlRO1iWlpnHVWL4EVF45zCCYakdVCIqv1anTEKUuk0H/s400/democrats-are-racist-obama-democrats-racists-racism-politics-1338987383.jpg

Democrats want to keep young Black, and poor White, Children trapped in failing Government/Public schools. They oppose School Choice programs that would allow young Blacks, and poor Whites, from getting better educations. Democrats keep lying how they are all about “Choice” until it comes to actually giving you any real Choices.

JLenardDetroit (Diary)  |   | 

When will the Black Community tell the Democrats to STOP insulting them? When will they recognize the Democrat Party lies?

Four Points…

1. ABORTION
Democrats want large numbers of Abortions within the Black Community as a means of suppression and control. Democrats always proclaim that they want CHOICE but Abortion to be SAFE AND RARE. Democrats claim Republicans want to make Abortion illegal. Let’s examine these LIES.
Republicans controlled the House, the Senate, and the Presidency under George W. Bush – did they at any time attempt to make Abortion illegal? NO. Did they at any time attempt to infringe on Abortion Rights? NO! Republicans control the House, Senate, and Governorship of several States – have they, in any of them, moved to make Abortion illegal? Again, NO!
Democrats want Abortion to be SAFE AND RARE. Texas, and other States, demonstrates that LIE! Texas has moved to make Abortions SAFE, and to protect Women’s Health, by requiring Abortionists to have admitting privileges/rights at a local Hospital. Have they attempted to make Abortions illegal? NO! Democrats have fought these Common Sense PROTECTIONS FOR WOMEN and want Abortion to be available ANYWHERE AT ANY TIME by anyone with a Coat-hanger to perform them.

2. EDUCATION / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION / SCHOOL CHOICE
Democrats continually tell the Black Community that their children are inferior and just too stupid to make it on their own. They insist you need Democrats and their Affirmative Action policies. Democrats want to keep young Black, and poor White, Children trapped in failing Government/Public schools. They oppose School Choice programs that would allow young Blacks, and poor Whites, from getting better educations. Democrats keep lying how they are all about “Choice” until it comes to actually giving you any real Choices.
Republicans wish to do something about the continued decline of Education in America. Democrats want to continue to dumb down everyone, generation by generation.

3. VOTER ID
 How many times are people going to continue to allow Democrats to call the Black Community STUPID AND LAZY?
Democrats say they have to oppose Voter Id because Blacks are (too stupid and/or lazy and) incapable of getting a Free Id. Republicans treat you with the dignity and respect to know that most Blacks already have Ids and that others are more than intelligent enough and capable of obtaining them and that Programs can, could, and should be created by non-profit “Get Out The Vote” Groups to assist the poor and/or anyone else that does not already have one and get them to a DMV office for their FREE ID.

4. 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS
Democrats are for Gun Control in the Urban Communities and keeping Blacks from being able to protect themselves in their own homes. Democrats want you to continue to be victims of Crime while they continue to be, and appoint Judges who are, soft on Criminals.
The Democrats LIE. Republicans and TEA Party members are constantly being accused of being Racist just for opposing bad policies of Barack Obama that has disproportionally effected the Black Community – higher unemployment, more people becoming poor not less, etc. It’s time to ask yourself, given the FACTS and positions of the Parties – Who are the real Racists?!?!?! Republicans focus on POLICIES and EQUALITY while Democrats obsess over Obama’s Race. Republicans insist Obama be treated EQUAL to other Presidents, while Democrats insist that because he is Black he must be treated differently — THAT IS RACIST!





When will the DENIAL end?
See related: Liberals’ Religion is Government – their motto: Separation FROM Church TO State – at: http://rattlewithus.ning.com/profiles/blogs/lib-religion

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Democrat Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) Runs For Cover -- Now Says: Kill the 'Death Panel'

Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Nov 13, 2013


http://redstatements.co/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/death-panel.jpg

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) said on C-SPAN Wednesday morning that the Independent Payments Advisory Board (IPAB)--the so-called "death panel" of Obamacare, which will cut Medicare costs by restricting care--should be "revisited."

His comments came as more Democrats are joining calls to amend Obamacare, in particular by supporting the Keep Your Health Plan Act, proposed by Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), which would fulfill President Barack Obama's oft-repeated promise that patients could keep their existing health insurance.

Cardin was responding to a caller who had expressed concerns about the constitutionality of the IPAB, which former White House Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag has championed as a central part of Obamacare.
Cardin said, via the Washington Free Beacon:

"The Affordable Care Act contains many provisions. I strongly supported the bill itself. But in terms of that particular provision, I agree, there are certain concerns that I have. The purpose of the board is to make sure that health care costs are maintained at a reasonable level and that there is an objective review of the payments made under the healthcare system. That was the main purpose of this board in its report. It comes into effect under certain circumstances. It has not been implemented yet, but it is a provision in the law that needs to be revisited to make sure the concerns you expressed do not occur."


Former Gov. Sarah Palin once called the IPAB a "death panel," and was mocked for doing so. Now, however, it appears that Democrats are worrying about political backlash against the IPAB from their constituents.