Monday, March 24, 2014

UNCW assistant professor goes through atheism to discover his faith in God

 Verne Strickland / USA DOT COM / March 24, 2014 

God parts the Red Sea, and liberal theologians at UNCW are livid. Bless their hearts. 

At the University of North Carolina Wilmington, Dr. Mike Adams teaches crime -- but he never dreamed he'd be the victim of one. Unfortunately for the assistant professor, that all changed when his ideology did. When he was hired as a criminology expert 21 years ago, Adams was an avowed and outspoken atheist -- a worldview that was shaken to the core when Mike went to visit a prisoner on death row in 2000. The convict, a mentally handicapped man, had read the entire Bible -- something Adams had never done. He resolved then and there to change that -- and when he did, Mike was completely transformed.
The once-vocal liberal became a passionate follower of Christ, a conversion that ultimately bled over into his political beliefs. Over time, he started writing columns and doing media appearances from a conservative perspective -- infuriating UNCW's forces of political correctness in the process. Like most universities, the faculty was a fraternity of liberals, who insist on diversity but practice anything but. After a slew of awards and accolades for his work, Mike applied for a full professorship in 2006.
Despite a glowing record, the University turned down his application. Apparently, the only promotion UNCW is interested in is the promotion of the liberal agenda. As his lead attorney, David French, writes in NRO, administrators engaged in the fiercest kind of viewpoint discrimination. It was "a process where they applied a made-up promotion standard that contradicted the faculty handbook, passed along false information about his academic record, deceptively edited documents to influence the faculty vote, explicitly discussed his constitutionally protected viewpoint, and allowed a faculty member with an obvious and outrageous conflict of interest to cast a vote against him." At one point, the University even launched an underground investigation (at the request of a transgender group) to determine if the professor was "transphobic."
Stunned, Adams sued, insisting the school had infringed on his free speech rights. After hearing the details, our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom agreed to represent Mike, and together they embarked on a seven year journey to right the University's wrong. Last week, after winding through the appeals process, Mike Adams finally got the news he was waiting for. Although UNCW officials denied that they were retaliating against Adams for his faith -- the court disagreed. After seeing the evidence, a federal jury agreed that Adams's speech was a "substantial or motivating factor" in denying him a full professorship. When pressed, UNCW officials couldn't prove that they would have made the same decision in the absence of his conservative beliefs. Although the case isn't over (the court hasn't decided what form of "relief" to grant -- nor has the school decided whether to appeal), the victory is a major one.

Friday, March 21, 2014

Governor Holshouser spearheads 1973 NC trade mission to Ukraine



EXCLUSIVE REPORT:     UKRAINE SAGA



     45 years ago, USSR agricultural breadbasket
  Agriculture 

Today: Chip in global chess game with USSR 
 

COMING SOON




                               By Verne Strickland / USA DOT COM  

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Air Force: Christians' Religious Speech Not Legally Protected Right

Verne Strickland via USA Dot Com:
Remember 'Coming in on a Wing and a Prayer' -- the popular inspirational song about U.S. airmen putting their trust in God as they crash-landed their bomber during World War II? Well, our all-seeing, all-pervasive U.S. government aims to clip the wings of faith that our U.S. Air Force heroes have depended on for so long. Our God is surely offended deeply by such a power grab. Our government has exceeded its bounds. It must be put in its place.

Government gutting all reference to God in air force pronouncements

Christians in the U.S. military are being told they must forfeit their First Amendment rights. Bible verses are being erased from cadets’ personal dorm-room white boards, and military lawyers claim that legal protections for religion only pertain to matters such as clothing and growing beards but do not extend to any religious expression such as talking about one's faith or posting a Bible verse. Last year Breitbart News broke the story of a campaign by anti-Christian extremists to suppress traditional Christian expression within the U.S. military. There were conflicting stories regarding the possible court martial of service members who share the gospel of Jesus Christ and confirmed reports of military chaplains being officially censored, as well as Bibles temporarily banned from the Walter Reed military hospital.
After these stories went viral on the Internet, Republicans in Congress launched an investigation, then introduced legislation to specify that religious expression is a protected right for men and women serving in uniform. Although President Obama originally threatened to veto the legislation, those protections were signed into law in December 2013.
Now these new protections are being put to their first test. Military officers at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs are saying that the Obama-Hagel Pentagon does not regard these new protections as encompassing religious speech or writing. As such, cadets are not allowed to post Bible verses on their personal white boards in their dorm rooms.
This latest incident occurred when a cadet (whose identity we are not disclosing) posted Galatians 2:20 on his personal whiteboard, posted outside his living quarters in a residential dormitory. That verse reads, “I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”
According to media reports, several people at the academy contacted Mikey Weinstein and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, the radical anti-Christian group that had been in communication with the Defense Department under President Obama regarding adopting new policies for religious expression in the military. Weinstein claimed that he called the Air Force Academy to complain about the Bible verse and further claims that two hours and nine minutes later, the verse was gone.
Sources quote Weinstein as saying that having this verse on the outside of the dorm room “clearly elevated one religious faith over all others at an already virulently hyper-fundamentalist Christian institution.” He is quoted as adding, “It massively poured fundamentalist Christian gasoline on an already raging out-of-control conflagration of fundamentalist Christian tyranny…”
Contrary to existing reports, Academy personnel did not erase the Bible verse or order the cadet to remove it.
Breitbart News spoke with Mike Berry, an attorney who is director of military affairs with Liberty Institute. Berry traveled to the Academy last week and met with cadets of different religions. These cadets say these personal messages are traditionally allowed on cadets’ whiteboards. A message might ask to meet for a basketball game or root for a favorite sports team. They claim it is a meaningful exercise in which many cadets include spiritual or inspirational quotes, whether Bible verses, a verse from the Quran, or from football legend Vince Lombardi.
Berry exclusively tells Breitbart News:

We met with Col. Paul Barzler, the Air Force Academy Staff Judge Advocate, to find out what really happened and to ask about the Academy’s policy on religious exercise. It turns out that, contrary to Mikey Weinstein’s claims, the cadet may have voluntarily removed the Bible verse from his white board. But I was stunned to find out that, had the cadet not removed the verse, Academy officials would have ordered him to do so. I asked why, and Col. Barzler explained that, because the cadet held a leadership position, it could create the perception that he was forcing his religious beliefs on subordinates. I pointed out that under the Constitution, federal law, and military regulations, cadets have the right to religious exercise. I was shocked when he responded that Air Force policy, from the Pentagon, is that the term "religious exercise" does not include written or verbal speech. [emphasis added]

Berry then reminded the colonel regarding the specific legal protections service members have, from the Constitution itself, to Acts of Congress, to military regulations. He says of the colonel’s response:

He went on to state that the Air Force interprets [Department of Defense] Instruction 1300.07 to only apply to religious grooming and apparel matters, but not writing a [Bible] verse on a white board or even verbally sharing a verse. This means that, under Air Force policy, cadets and airmen are not free to express their religious beliefs through words or writing. This policy appears to come from a March 2013 Air Force JAG memo that interpreted federal law in that way. 

Last week, on Mar. 14, 2014, the Air Force Academy issued a press release regarding this situation. It says, “While we swear an oath to Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States, Airmen are also bound by [military policy].” It references Air Force Instruction 1-1, which was adopted several years ago once President Obama took office and is frequently used to suppress religious speech, especially by Christians. The press release then adds that “sometimes we must put the good of the entire unit before the good of any single individual.”

This press release only makes the situation more alarming to a legal analyst. An Air Force policy instruction carries some force of law, but it is trumped by a Defense Department regulation. Those regulations, in turn, are subordinate to federal statutes adopted by Congress, which for over three months now has expressly provided that religious expression is a protected right. All of those must follow the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, where the First Amendment makes both free speech and free exercise of religion fundamental rights for all Americans.

As Berry summarized, “This is a stunning development because it is now clear that the Air Force is interpreting federal law and military regulations in an unlawful way. And it is absolutely shameful because the brave men and women of the U.S. Air Force who make huge sacrifices for our religious freedom are having theirs stripped away.” Hinting at legal action that could be forthcoming, Berry concluded, “This is not only morally wrong, it’s illegal.”

Ken Klukowski is senior legal analyst for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @kenklukowski.


Tuesday, February 18, 2014

US Senate candidate Brannon had unpaid property tax bill


@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

US Senate candidate had unpaid property tax bill

By Verne Strickland / Blogmaster / Feb 18 2014
— One of the announced candidates candidates for this year's U.S. Senate campaign had an unpaid property tax bill until it was brought to his attention by WRAL News Tuesday morning.
Dr. Greg Brannon, a Cary obstetrician, and his wife owed $8,779.19 on the home they live in in Cary, according to the Wake County tax records.
Brannon is one of five Republicans who have announced or filed to run against Democratic U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan.
A check of the county tax department systems in their home counties shows that Hagan and Republicans state House Speaker Thom Tillis, Rev. Mark Harris, nurse Heath Grant and former Shelby Mayor William Alexander are current on their property tax bills.
In general, North Carolina property tax bills are due at the end of September. However, interest and penalties don't begin to accrue until the first week of January.
Wake County property tax records put the value of Brannon's house at $968,278.
Brannon, who was in Wake County court Tuesday waiting for a verdict in an unrelated civil trial, said he did not know he had an unpaid property tax bill and said his wife usually handles family business items such as that.
"Wow, thank you. I've got to make sure of that," he said when asked about the bill.
Shortly after he was asked about the bill, property tax records showed that he had paid the back taxes in full.
Looking for comments?

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Senate candidate Greg Brannon faces fraud allegations in civil lawsuit

How could this be? How could this possibly be? Yet here it is -- a missile through the side of a U.S. Senate candidate in the race to succeed Senator Kay Hagan.

You must see for yourself. This is not a take-down for candidate Dr. Greg Brannon. It is a positive statement -- avote for NC House Speaker Thom Tillis. Read it for yourself. Judge for yourself.

This is spring plowing, and planting time for a new crop of contenders. This is a warning shot across the bow of the U.S.S. Greg Bannon. There will doubtless be return fire from the guns of the Brannon on her maiden voyage in search of the prize.

And there will be thunderous salvos from the proud U.S.S. Thom Tillotson. This one is for all the marbles. May the better man win. This skirmish even before the onset of the full battle will make some grown men cry and others ravenous for blood.

But there is blood flowing already -- from the negative positioning mounted by Brannon. And the withering fire from the media, setting the record straight as Dr. Brannon's past, and his tactics, return to haunt him even at this early stage of the game. 

This will be a fight for the soul of the Republican Party of North Carolina -- with implications for the national stage in 2014.

Don't leave your seats. This is going to be good.


Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/02/03/4661605/senate-candidate-greg-brannon.html#.UvGBbc77fWV#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/02/03/4661605/senate-candidate-greg-brannon.html#.UvGBbc77fWV#storylink=cpyBy John Frank and Jim Morrill
SENATE FORUM
Robert Lahser@charlotteobserver.com
Senate candidate Greg Brannon speaks Thursday at the Republican U.S. Senate forum at the Fox and Hound Restaurant in Huntersville.

RALEIGH -- One is a former medical school classmate and family friend. The other is the husband of his one-time pregnant patient.

The two men say that in 2010, Greg Brannon helped convince them to invest a combined $250,000 in a technology company he co-founded that promised to develop an “augmented reality” application for smartphones. The investment, company officials promised, was a once-in-a-decade opportunity.

Now, three years after the company abruptly shuttered its operations, Brannon is facing a civil legal complaint alleging he offered misleading advice.

The years-old case – which is scheduled to go to trial Monday – is being seen in a new political context as Brannon emerges as one of the leading Republican challengers to front-runner Thom Tillis in the crowded GOP U.S. Senate race. The winner of the May primary will face Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan.

Brannon, a Cary OB-GYN, defends his role as a board member at the Raleigh-based tech company, Neogence Enterprises, and is asking for the charges to be dismissed. In an interview last week, Brannon declined to discuss the case at length. “I can’t wait for my day in court,” he said.

The company’s founding and quick demise are outlined in hundreds of pages of Wake County court documents recently reviewed by The News & Observer and Charlotte Observer. Brannon is one of two Wake County defendants in the case; the other is CEO Robert Rice of Raleigh. Another company executive recently was dismissed from the case.

A judge also dismissed charges of fraud and violating trade practices. The two investors are seeking to recoup their money in addition to damages and attorney fees.

In court papers, the investors, Lawrence “Larry” Piazza, of Maine, and Salvatore “Sam” Lampuri, of Raleigh, described in detail how Brannon pitched them on the company’s bid to create Mirascape, a smartphone application that is a “social augmented reality network connecting people, places and things.” A company prospectus promised to fill in the gaps that Facebook, Google, Foursquare and other prominent apps were missing.

Brannon’s involvement may hinge on an email he sent April 30, 2010, to Piazza, his medical school friend, and other investors stating that the company’s chief sales officer, John Cummings, met with Verizon in New York City. The company, he said, needed $100,000 to $200,000 to develop a pitch for a subsequent meeting weeks later.

“I know all of you are BUSY!!!” Brannon wrote, according to court documents. “I need you to give a few minutes to look at this potential. THANK YOU for your TRUST!! Greg.”

Rice, the CEO, followed up with a memo, suggesting Verizon might feature the Mirascape app on all its Droid mobile devices. “The challenge here, is that we have to jump to warp speed to accelerate development,” he wrote. “This is a one-shot opportunity.”

The investors labeled the statements misleading when the deal didn’t come to fruition. In court papers, Cummings said that Verizon never discussed making Mirascape a pre-installed feature on its devices.

Before the emails, Piazza had invested $50,000 in the company. But based on the Brannon and Rice correspondence, Piazza asserted in court papers that he put another $100,000 into the company in May 2010.

In court documents, Brannon acknowledges sending the April 30, 2010, email about the Verizon opportunity, but he suggests his role was merely as the messenger, communicating what he heard from the company’s sales associate through Rice.

“I expected that all our investors were savvy enough and sophisticated enough to understand that opportunity was just that,” he wrote. “It wasn’t a slam dunk, it wasn’t a guarantee.”

Lampuri, a Raleigh-area plumber whose wife went to Brannon’s medical clinic, put $100,000 into Neogence in September 2010. Both Lampuri and Piazza received a convertible promissory note, which would mature at a certain date and allow a return of the investment or conversion to ownership stock.

In a deposition, Lampuri describes how Brannon talked business with him when his wife came for monthly doctor appointments during her pregnancy. “He pretty much spoke about Neogence every time my wife was in stirrups,” he told attorneys.

According to court documents, Piazza reconnected with Brannon in 1995 when he called to tell him he had cancer. The Brannon and Piazza families visited each other in Maine and North Carolina, and they even went to Disney World together.
The two men often discussed investing and in the mid-’90s, Piazza put $25,000 into Arckosian Entertainment, another company led by a then-24-year-old Rice.
 It, too, wasn’t successful; the company dissolved in 1998, according to state records.

Brannon invested $60,000 into Arckosian, he wrote in court papers, and put between $8,000-12,000 into Neogence in “needy times.”

In a deposition, Piazza said he wouldn’t invest with Brannon again. Asked why, he answered,“Trust.”

Brannon offered his own narrative into why Neogence failed, blaming it in part on Piazza for meddling in the company’s affairs and saying employees went without pay for weeks.

At one point, Brannon even offered to liquidate his 401(k) retirement account to pay Piazza back because he “felt morally that I should do so to satisfy a friend.” Piazza declined, Brannon wrote, only to come back later and ask for a refund. By then, Brannon said he had other obligations surrounding recent deaths in his family and the adoption of his third child from China.

When Piazza informed Brannon that he intended to cash out his promissory note in early July 2011, Brannon wrote that he and Rice acted on an attorney’s advice and resigned their board positions and closed the company’s doors.
Frank: 919-829-4698

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

U.S. Senator Kay Hagan -- NC's leading abortion advocate.



U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C.





















"You know, many of them are only about
this big when we get 'em. They don't put
up much of a fight."

IT'S TIME THAT KAY HAGAN IS REMOVED
FROM THE PROTECTIVE WOMB OF THE
U.S. SENATE AND DISPOSED OF -- LIKE
THE INNOCENT BABIES ABORTED ON
HER WATCH.

RIGHT NOW SHE'S AS VULNERABLE AS
AN UNBORN CHILD ON HER ABORTION LIST.


Republican Thom Tillis is likely to upset Kay Hagan -- So says top NC political soothsayer!


Thom Tillis Speaking

John Davis Political Report – January 10, 2014: North Carolina’s U.S. Senate Race: Numbers Say Republican Thom Tillis is Likely to Upset Kay Hagan

Of course, the great hope of Brannon/Harris/Flynn/Grant is to force a primary runoff by ganging up on Tillis with enough outside super PAC attack ads that keep his vote below 40%. However, the odds are greater that they will splinter the hard right conservatives and Tillis will parlay a sizable cash and organizational advantage into a primary victory on May 6, 2014.
Tillis’ legislative accomplishments are such that it will simply be too difficult for any Republican to get very far with an attempt to discredit his commitment to the conservative cause. In other words, even his on primary detractors will not likely stay divided against him for long. They want to defeat Hagan.
The Shutdown last December taught most Republicans two important lessons: one, bitter ideological divisions hurt them more than the Democrats; two, just saying no without an alternative proposal is not acceptable to most Americans as leadership.