Saturday, November 8, 2014

NC race morphed into Obama referendum

Chris Seward - cseward@newsobserver.com

If you have any doubts about how toxic President Barack Obama was to Democrats last week, just ask state Sen. Gene McLaurin.
McLaurin, a Rockingham Democrat, was North Carolina’s only Senate incumbent to lose re-election. And he says the reason was a late TV ad run by his opponent, Republican Tom McInnis.
The ad opens with an image of Obama saying though he wasn’t on the ballot, his policies were.
“Obama’s policies?” says a narrator. “Gene McLaurin is for him. McLaurin voted to expand Obamacare. … And the NRA rates McLaurin anti-gun – just like Obama. Obama and McLaurin. Tom McInnis. Against the Obama agenda.”
McLaurin’s face gradually morphs into Obama’s.
Toward the the end of his campaign, McLaurin saw people come up and tell him they couldn’t vote for him because he supported Obamacare.
“No question it had an effect,” McLaurin says of the ad. “I don think there was any doubt that that was the deciding factor.”
It would be hard to think of a more unlikely Democrat to tie to the president. McLaurin, who was mayor of Rockingham for 15 years, is a moderate conservative who often voted with the GOP. Last summer he was the only Democrat who voted for the Republican-written budget.
Last November, he says GOP Senate leaders even asked him to switch parties. After considering it, he decided not to.
Yet the state GOP funneled $100,000 to his opponent the week before the election.
“They turned it into a referendum on what was going on in Washington instead of the issues important to North Carolina,” he says.
“I learned politics is about the label you have next to your name, whether it’s Republican or Democrat.”  

Hillary Clinton vs. Adam Sandler?
Now that the election’s over, it’s time to think about the next one. At least for folks at the Elon University Poll.
In late October, the poll asked 996 North Carolina voters an open-ended question: “Who would you most like to see run for president in 2016?”
The survey found that 52.9 percent of Democrats want Hillary Clinton. That was 24 times more that those who mentioned Elizabeth Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts.
Among Republicans, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney led the field with 18.6 percent. Retired surgeon Ben Carson was next with 5.8 percent. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was third with 4.5 percent.
As an open-ended question, the poll elicited the usual variety of responses. Santa Claus was a Democratic choice. So were Adam Sandler and Stephen Colbert, who each pulled 0.4 percent support.
“We do not expect 1 percent of North Carolina registered voters to seriously want Adam Sandler as president,” said an Elon news release. “Nonetheless, we share these fun results because they suggest that Romney, Clinton, Paul, Carson and Warren are names to watch.”
The next election may be closer than you think.
In 2013 the Republican-controlled General Assembly moved the state’s primary day from May to as early as February or March 2016. Jim Morrill
Tillis’ secret weapon – Latinos
Latinos across North Carolina are taking credit for unseating U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan and replacing her with Thom Tillis – the Republican who accused Hagan of being too soft on immigration.
In the weeks leading up to the election, groups such as the NC Dream Team erected billboards saying Hagan is no friend of immigrants. They climbed on stage with protest signs at get out the vote rallies and even heckled Hillary Clinton at a Hagan rally in Charlotte.
Viridiana Martinez of the NC Dream Team, which organized several protest efforts against Hagan, said their work was not about endorsing Tillis; it was about holding Hagan accountable.
“The fact that the senator took anti-immigrant measure after anti-immigrant measure, and there never were any consequences.”
The episodes only contributed a narrative that Obama and the Democrats had lost control of the country. They had even lost the support of once-loyal factions that should have been on their side.
Immigration is ranked as the top issue among 57 percent of Latino voters in the state, according to an election eve poll by public opinion research firm.

Latino Decisions.
Hagan ticked off immigrant rights groups this year when she publicly opposed Obama’s efforts to issue an executive order that would expand the amount of undocumented immigrants who could remain and work legally in the United States.
“This isn’t about a political party. This is about accountability,” Martinez said. “This is about a party who has been pretending to be our friend forever and forever and forever. But the reality is friends don’t deport friends.”
Latinos make up less than 2 percent of the states nearly 6.6 million voters.
The N.C. Board of Elections said it would likely be weeks before it’s clear how many Latinos turned out, but history shows they generally don’t show up in high numbers for midterms. Less than 20 percent of the state’s Latino voters cast a ballot in the past two midterm elections.
 Franco OrdoƱez
Two for two
Among last week’s big winners was a man not even on the ballot.
Paul Shumaker, a Republican consultant from Granite Falls, was the top strategist for Tillis’ successful U.S. Senate campaign. That makes him two for two.
He’s also the campaign strategist for GOP Sen. Richard Burr.
It was Shumaker who predicted early on that Tillis’ race against Democratic Hagan would be a referendum on Obama, even while Democrats hammered Tillis over a host of legislative controversies.
“This race is going to be decided by the national mood,” he said last summer. “The D.C. cloud is much darker than the Raleigh cloud is. We have a thunderstorm in North Carolina. They have a Category 5 hurricane.”
When the national mood did decide the race, it found Shumaker with two U.S. Senate clients. Asked how that felt, he said, “Twice as good as one.”
“I do campaigns,” he said. “It’s what I do. You finish one, you go to the next one.” Jim Morrill

Black Caucus to vote in February
Charlotte Mecklenburg’s Black Political Caucus plans to elect new officers in February, and anybody interested in running has to make sure they join the caucus by next month.
Caucus elections are Feb. 15. Nominating committee member Colette Forrest says people who want to run should join the caucus by Dec. 31.

'We have swept this nation,' North Carolina Republican Tillis says. 'Y’all refused to lose and that’s why I’m standing here.'



 via Verne Strickland / usadotcom / Nov. 8, 2014
Politics Now
Political, campaign and national news



'We have swept this nation,' North Carolina Republican Tillis says . . .




Republican Thom Tillis elected to U.S. Senate in North Carolina, defeating incumbent Kay Hagan
Republican Thom Tillis unseated first-term Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan in this closely divided state, after a campaign that served as a nasty and free-spending battleground for outside groups on both sides.
Tillis, whose tenure as speaker of the Republican-led state House became a major issue in the race, rode a wave of discontent over President Obama to beat Hagan, who failed to inspire much passion even in her base. Like other Democrats around the country, she struggled to gain momentum as Tillis turned the race into a referendum on the Obama presidency.


The loss was a body blow for Democrats nationally, who had poured tens of millions of dollars into North Carolina – a state where they outnumber Republicans – to try to salvage their Senate majority. In his victory speech early Wednesday, Tillis said he prevailed against the negative ads that attacked his record in the state Legislature.



 “We didn’t bend; we won,” he said. “We have swept this nation. Somehow I think Sen. [Harry] Reid is going to have a different office assignment in January," he added, referring to the Democratic majority leader.
The crowd at Tillis’ party here erupted in cheers and chants of “USA! USA!” after the race was called for him late Tuesday, adding to the string of Republican victories that gave them the majority in the Senate for the first time in eight years.
The race was the most expensive Senate campaign ever, with outside groups providing the biggest share of $107 million in spending. Most of the money went into a television ad war that frayed voters’ patience, and into aggressive turnout efforts on both sides.


Republican leaders gave part of the credit to a stronger turnout operation that they began building two years ago.
“The reason they spent all that money was they knew what we had here,” Tillis said. “Hundreds and hundreds of volunteers knocking on doors, doing what they had to do to win. Y’all refused to lose and that’s why I’m standing here.”


Once a reliably red state, North Carolina has become a roiling swing state in the last few elections; it went for Obama in the 2008 presidential election, but for Republican Mitt Romney in 2012.
The Senate race, featuring a relentless parade of attack advertising, became a referendum on who was more unpopular: Obama, the focus of the Republican attacks, or the Republican state Legislature, which pushed through a conservative agenda that included trims to education spending and limits on early voting.
Democrats were reported to be leading in the early vote totals, but Hagan was unable to pull enough votes in Charlotte, the state’s largest city, and the Raleigh-Durham area to offset Tillis’ advantages in more rural parts of the state.
Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times

Friday, November 7, 2014

Obama and Congressional Leaders Discuss How to Move on Immigration. Biden Uses Soup Spoon on Caesar Salad.

 via Verne Strickland aol dot com Nov. 7, 2014

Obama and Congressional Leaders Discuss How to Move on Immigration

Photo
President Obama met on Friday with Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Charles E. Schumer and others. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — Speaker John A. Boehner warned President Obama in person Friday that taking unilateral action to ease deportation of undocumented immigrants would rupture relations with the new Republican majority and would kill efforts to overhaul immigration policy as congressional leaders gathered at the White House for the first time since Tuesday’s elections.
At a session that also touched on efforts to fight Islamic terrorists and halt the spread of Ebola, Mr. Boehner tried to assure Mr. Obama and Democratic leaders that Republicans intended to pursue immigration law changes next year. But, despite prompting by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Mr. Boehner would say only that it would take months to make progress, according to accounts of the meeting provided by multiple people familiar with what took place.
The mostly cordial session over a lunch of herb-crusted sea bass and pumpkin tarts was held in advance of a lame-duck session of Congress scheduled to begin next Wednesday, and the lawmakers each left with a six-pack of White House beer. But, Mr. Obama’s vow to take action on immigration is certain to hang over the return of lawmakers after an election that saw Republicans grab control of the Senate and increase their House majority as of January.
While it was not discussed at the White House session, Senate Democrats have begun weighing whether to allow Republicans a vote on their proposal to block any executive action by the president — a plan that Democrats believe they can defeat on the floor.
During the meeting with 13 House and Senate leaders, officials said, the president pushed back against Mr. Boehner, saying Mr. Obama had legitimate authority to act on his own as other presidents have. He was backed in that argument by Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader.
“The president has the authority to act by executive order on immigration,” Ms. Pelosi told reporters after the session. “It’s in the law, but it’s also in the precedent of other presidents, whether it’s President Eisenhower, Kennedy, both Bushes, President Reagan — it just goes on and on.”
The meeting also included a briefing by Pentagon officials on efforts to combat the Islamic State militant group. Mr. Obama told congressional leaders that he intended to work with them on a new authorization to use force against the group, most likely in the new Congress. Aides to Mr. Boehner said the speaker welcomed that decision and reminded the president that, historically, the White House has drafted the resolution, sent it to Capitol Hill and help push its passage. Mr. Boehner said Republicans would help with its approval.
The White House, on a day when administration officials were trumpeting the ninth straight month of more than 200,000 additional jobs, said the president urged congressional leaders “to pass a budget for the rest of the fiscal year in the same bipartisan, drama-free way they did earlier this year because there is no reason to create uncertainty for businesses that are putting Americans back to work.”

The offices of Senator Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat and current majority leader, and Mr. Boehner have been conferring over a lame-duck agenda, with both parties trying to game out what would be to their advantage to dispose of before Republicans take over the Senate and what they can afford to push into 2015.
Leaders of both parties would like to fund the government through Sept. 30 and eliminate any talk of a shutdown for now. Members of the Appropriations Committees favor doing it through a package of new spending bills rather than just funding agencies at current levels. Passing the new bills in a so-called omnibus allows lawmakers to reset agency priorities, but House Republicans have balked in the past at passing such big packages and the leadership may have to settle for a simple extension.
They also have expressed growing interest in trying to pass legislation overhauling the National Security Agency’s once-secret program that is systematically collecting records about Americans’ phone calls. The legal basis for the current call records program, Section 215 of the Patriot Act, will expire in June 2015 without new action.
But because surveillance issues can scramble the usual partisan lines — splitting libertarian conservatives from national security hawks, for instance — it may be in the Republicans’ interest to get the bill out of the way before they assume control of the Senate, avoiding internal discord.
The House of Representatives in May passed a version of the bill, called the U.S.A. Freedom Act, but the Senate has not yet taken up its version, sponsored by Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who leads the Senate Judiciary Committee. In September, James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, and Eric H. Holder Jr., the attorney general, endorsed Mr. Leahy’s bill. It also has support from Silicon Valley as well as from the conservative Republican Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Ted Cruz of Texas.
The central element of Mr. Leahy’s bill would get the N.S.A. out of the business of collecting bulk domestic phone records, which it uses to analyze links between people in hope of identifying previously unknown associates of terrorism suspects. Instead, the records would stay in the hands of phone companies, and a new kind of judicial order would permit the government to swiftly obtain calling records of a suspect, along with those of callers up to two links away, even if different companies hold them.
Senate officials are also in negotiations over possible approval of select judicial, executive branch and ambassadorial nominations.
Congressional leaders also want to approve a renewal of the terrorism-risk insurance program and extend a series of business and energy tax breaks, making some of them permanent.

North Carolina: Thom Tillis victory over Kay Hagan helps GOP take US Senate




Verne Strickland usadotcom 11/7/14
It's hard to believe, but this story was posted only two days ago. And even though it is a News & Observer product, it can get pretty high marks from a conservative Republican writer who backed winner Thom Tillis. So -- thanks for small blessings. Now let's get out of the election's shadows and move forward. That doesn't mean capitulating or going overboard with compromise. It means going forward -- on our terms.

North Carolina: Thom Tillis victory over Kay Hagan helps GOP take US Senate

 By CRAIG JARVIS / The News & Observer (Raleigh, NC) Nov. 5, 2014 


— Thom Tillis has won the hard-fought contest with U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan that was the most expensive Senate race in the country's history.
Just before midnight Tuesday, Hagan conceded defeat, promising to work with Tillis during the transition. She thanked her husband, Chip, and her family for their support.
With about 98 percent of the precincts reporting, Tillis maintained a lead of around 50,000 votes. He had 48.95 percent of the vote to Hagan's 47.14 percent. Libertarian Sean Haugh had 3.24 percent.
Tillis won in the west, except for Asheville, and in the state's southeastern counties and on the Outer Banks. Hagan found most success in urban counties, taking Wake County 55 percent to 42 percent.
At Charlotte's Omni Hotel, Tillis supporters broke out in jubilant cheers as FoxNews declared him the victor shortly before 11:30 p.m. The crowd chanted "Thom" and "USA" and sang na na, hey hey, goodbye.
Hagan had been considered vulnerable from early on but had consistently kept a small lead in polls and Democrats had thought she might help them retain their Senate majority. But Republicans fought hard to gain the six seats they needed to gain control. Hagan's defeat added to Democratic losses in Kentucky, Colorado, Arkansas, West Virginia, Montana and South Dakota.
"Kay Hagan is suffering the same fate as other Democrats throughout the South," said David McLennan, a political science professor at Meredith College in Raleigh. "From Mitch McConnell's relative easy victory in Kentucky to Ed Gillespie's strong showing against Virginia incumbent Mark Warner, it appears that President Obama's disapproval among Southern voters was a very difficult burden for Democrats to overcome."
Even though polls showed Hagan with a slight lead coming into Election Day, Republican enthusiasm for the midterm elections may have led to higher turnout than expected, McLennan said.
The senator didn't appear to cash in on the women's vote, he said, with exit polls showing "the gender gap was essentially a wash, with men favoring Tillis and women favoring Hagan by about the same amount.
Andrew Taylor, a political science professor at North Carolina State University, contrasted the national GOP momentum with Tillis' performance.
"It is interesting that the Republicans are having a big night nationally and will take the Senate quite comfortably" while the Tillis-Hagan race was the closest in the country, Taylor said. "Instead of running with Tom Cotton in Arkansas, he's running behind Cory Gardner in Colorado and Joni Ernst in Iowa, and running close to Ed Gillespie in Virginia and Scott Brown in Massachusetts."
Republicans made the campaign about President Barack Obama, who invited that strategy last month when he said his policies were on the ballot even though he wasn't. Mirroring GOP Senate candidates across the country, Tillis rarely missed an opportunity to include Obama in any sentence that also mentioned Hagan.
Obama's low approval ratings made Hagan and other endangered Senate Democrats keep a distance from him and stress their differences. But on Monday the president did four radio interviews in North Carolina: on "No Limit Larry in the Morning on WPEG in Charlotte," "Artie and Fly Ty in the Afternoon" on WBAV, also in Charlotte, "Mike and Friends in the Morning" on WFMI in Elizabeth City, and "The 3 Live Crew" on WJMH in Greensboro.
The radio interviews were among 14 Obama gave on Monday and Tuesday in states with close Senate or gubernatorial races.
For voters like Jerry Greenhoot, 78, of Charlotte, Obama was the problem. "It's as much an anti-Obama vote as any of the other reasons, but not entirely," he said at a Myers Park precinct. "I can"t think of one thing (Hagan) has done. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure that out. And I was one."
Greenhoot is a retired neurosurgeon.
In Charlotte, Gov. Pat McCrory, a longtime ally of Tillis', arrived at the Republican party in Charlotte about an hour after the polls closed.
"I think the campaign was good," McCrory said of Tillis' effort. "The only thing I didn't like was the amount of negative TV ads."
U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson stood on stage in front of an American flag at Tillis' results party around 10:20 pm Tuesday. "Tonight's a huge night for Republicans all across the country," he said.
As the evening wore on in Greensboro, Hagan and her campaign staff were keeping a low profile as the crowd began to thin out. Earlier in the night, supporters for Alma Adams, a Democrat, who won in the the state's Congressional 12th District, enthusiastically cheered her appearance. Mark Jewell, vice president of the North Carolina Association of Educators, representing 96,000 teachers, also fired up the crowd.
Earlier in the day, Stephanie Stewart, a daycare worker, left a polling station at Trinity A.M.E. Zion Church and said she voted for Hagan. "She's trying to help us, and Thom Tillis is trying to cut everything," she said.
In the church parking lot, at the prescribed distance from the voting entrance, Kim Ruthven, Hagan's sister-in-law who was up from Florida, held a Hagan sign and called out to voters, "It's a great day to vote for Kay!"
She'd been there since 6:30 a.m., she said late Tuesday afternoon. Everyone in Hagan's family had fanned out to some 20 polling places to try to give her campaign a boost.
"Thanks for voting. Tell your friends the polls are open until 7:30 tonight!" she said cheerfully as people left and got into their cars.
William Barnes, leaving the same polling place, said he voted for Tillis because he liked the raise for teachers this year and thought Tillis had done more for balancing the state budget and bringing jobs to the state.
Barnes said he lost his job a few years ago and had been working temporary jobs here and there. He voted for Hagan in 2008. "She's been saying jobs are getting better here in North Carolina, but I just don't see it," he said.
For her part, Hagan hammered away at Tillis' record as speaker of the state House, where he helped lead a conservative revolution that shook up 140 years of Democratic rule, prompting praise from business and small-government interests and scorn from advocates for the poor and middle class, education, the environment and women. Weekly protests drew thousands to the legislative building and led to mass arrests.
Tillis' task was to burnish his image as a moderate, business conservative while assuring anti-abortion, gun-rights and traditional marriage supporters that he also stood with them.
Hagan portrayed herself as a better reflection of North Carolina, one of the most middle-of-the-road members of the Senate who was also focused on improving the economy.
But both candidates painted each other as radicals, and where they left off, outside groups stepped in with more than 100,000 TV ads that left many people with campaign fatigue weeks ago. In excess of $100 million was spent on ads by both sides, mostly by outside interests with only murky accountability about who funds them.

The campaigns and their allies slung all manner of accusations against the contenders. But the one that seemed to gain the most traction was the fact that Hagan missed half of the Senate Armed Services Committee meetings.
Tillis also tried to capitalize on fears of terrorism, disease and border security to argue that the Obama administration hadn't done enough to keep the country safe.
Polls consistently showed Hagan with the smallest of leads, but always in front. Even Tillis' own internal polling showed no better than a tie last week. Although some polls have shown Tillis improving, the race has been from beginning to end too close to call.
Haugh, while adding a touch of levity to the race with his beer-sipping videos and his laid-back job as a pizza delivery man, was never expected to draw more than single-digit support.
But some analysts predicted that he might siphon votes of die-hard conservatives.
To counter that, an online ad campaign sought to steal Democrats from Hagan by promoting Haugh's support for legalizing drugs and against military intervention in other countries.

(Elisabeth Arriero of The Charlotte Observer, Lesley Clark of McClatchy's Washington bureau and news researcher David Raynor contributed.)

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Thursday, November 6, 2014

Why GOP won: Shifting white votes hurt Democrats

via Verne Strickland usadotcom


Why GOP won: Shifting white votes hurt Democrats

WASHINGTON (AP) - White voters of all ages were less likely to back Democrats this year than in elections past, helping Republicans nationwide but most acutely in the South - and overpowering Democratic efforts to turn out their core supporters among blacks and Hispanics.
In a nation growing ever more diverse, political forecasters repeatedly warn Republicans they must improve their appeal among minorities in order to remain competitive in the long term.
But for the Democrats, dominating the vote among minorities isn't enough to win elections today - and it won't be in the future if the GOP is able to run up similar margins among whites, who still make up a majority of voters in every state.
"The rule of thumb was Democrats could win with 90 percent of the African-American vote and 40 percent of the white vote," said Merle Black, a political science professor at Emory University in Atlanta.
"But now very few Democrats could think about getting 40 percent of the white vote. They're trying to get 30 percent. In the Deep South states, from South Carolina to Louisiana, it's very hard for the Democratic candidate to get 25 percent of the white vote."
Nationally, Republicans running for seats in the U.S. House won 60 percent of the white vote, while Democrats won the backing of 89 percent of African-Americans and 62 percent of Hispanics.
Those are nearly identical margins to the 2010 midterm elections. But Democrats won more of the white and Hispanic vote in 2006, the last midterm elections in which the party won control of the House. White voters last tilted in Democrats' favor in a midterm in 1990, and were a swing group in the 1980s.
The data on voters come from exit polls of voters nationally and in 27 states that were conducted for The Associated Press and the television networks by Edison Research. Most interviews were conducted among randomly selected voters at precincts nationwide and in each state.
Outside of the South, whites broke for Republicans by an average of 8 points on Tuesday. But in 10 Southern states with an election for Senate on the ballot, Republicans won the white vote by an average of 42 points. Democrats garnered so little support among whites in Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas that a majority of those voting for the Democratic candidate were non-white.
In North Carolina, though incumbent Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan was widely credited with running a solid campaign, she carried just 33 percent of the white vote - down from 39 percent in 2008 - and lost. White voters under age 30 backed Hagan by close to a 2-to-1 margin six years ago as they helped to sweep President Barack Obama into office.
This time, in a midterm election, the younger white voters who cast ballots in North Carolina broke just as decisively for Hagan's Republican opponent, state House Speaker Thom Tillis.
Steve Rosenthal, president of the Organizing Group, a Democratic-leaning consulting firm, said he's been jokingly calling this election the Seinfeld election for Democrats - they had no national message that resonated with their voters.
"It was an election about nothing. Republicans made it an election about President Obama. That was their goal," he said. "Their mission was to turn out people who were angry, people who were displeased with the job the president has done."
It was a mistake for Democrats to distance themselves from the president, said Erik Smith, a former Obama campaign adviser and Democratic strategist. Democratic voters are not motivated to help candidates who were happy to be with Obama two years ago, but tried to avoid his presence this year, he said.
"I'm sure (it) led a lot of these voters to say, 'How is this candidate going to treat me in two years?'" he said.
The only states in which Democratic Senate candidates improved their overall support among whites were Minnesota, Oregon and Mississippi, a Southern state where Travis Childers managed to grow the Democratic share of the white vote from 8 percent in 2008 to 16 percent.
Democratic voters were especially less engaged in states where there were not supposed to be competitive elections, said Michael McDonald, an associate professor of political science at the University of Florida who tracks voter turnout.
Democratic voters are traditionally more likely to stay home if the midterm races are uninspiring, while Republican voters - who tend to be older, wealthier and more educated and also are more likely to be white - generally come to the polls anyway, he said.
"The poster child for this would be Virginia. It's an uncompetitive race according to all the polls. In that environment, who sits out the election? It's predominantly Democrats," McDonald said.
Two days after the election, while heavily favored incumbent Democratic Virginia Sen. Mark Warner had a lead of a few thousand votes out of more than 2 million cast, the race remained too close to call.

Unrepentant Obama Vows Immigration Executive Action This Year

via Verne Strickland usadotcom 11/06/14



 

 

Unrepentant Obama Vows Immigration Executive Action This Year 

Thursday, 06 Nov 2014 AP


On a day when both sides tried to herald a new era of potential compromise, immigration stood out not only as a single obstacle to bipartisanship but as a sign that the hard-fought election and the heavy Democratic losses had not pushed partisan sparring aside.
"I have no doubt that there will be some Republicans who are angered or frustrated by any executive action that I may take," Obama said in a post-election news conference. "Those are folks, I just have to say, who are also deeply opposed to immigration reform, in any form, and blocked the House from being able to pass a bipartisan bill."
He cast his executive actions as an inducement for Republicans to pass their own immigration bill.
"The best way, if folks are serious about getting immigration reform done, is going ahead and passing a bill and getting it to my desk. And then the executive actions that I take go away," he said.
Republicans led by McConnell pledged to use their newfound majorities to stop him.
"I hope he won't do that, because I do think it poisons the well for the opportunity to address a very important domestic issue," McConnell said in Louisville, Kentucky, as he celebrated a victory in his own Senate race and the GOP's capture of the Senate.
Some on the right said executive action on immigration could even be grounds for impeachment. Several House Republicans said Obama would make it very difficult to cooperate on other issues if he acts on immigration.
"Him moving ahead like that, I think he's completely tone deaf to what happened last night," said Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn.
And a half-dozen GOP senators, including Ted Cruz of Texas, wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., on Wednesday urging him to quickly pass legislation to block Obama from taking executive action. Otherwise, the senators warned, they'll use "all procedural means necessary" to resolve what they called a constitutional crisis of Obama's making.
But Obama appeared in no mood for waiting. He had already angered Latinos and immigration advocacy groups this fall when he delayed executive action until after the election.
"What I'm not going to do is just wait," he said. "I think it's fair to say I've shown a lot of patience."
Immigration advocates made clear that their patience, too, was at an end.
"The election is over. Act boldly to bring relief to the millions facing deportation and family separation," Janet Murguia, head of National Council of La Raza, said at a news conference Wednesday. "The Hispanic community has waited too long and expects you to fulfill your promise."
White House officials say Obama, who is traveling to Asia and Australia next week, would not take any action until late November at the earliest and could wait until December.

Advocates in touch with the White House expect Obama to expand a 2-year-old program that deferred deportations for more than 500,000 immigrants brought here illegally as minors, and made them eligible for work permits. He is also expected to take steps to make more business visas available.
Advocates say White House officials are debating whether to require a certain term of residency in the U.S. — say 10 years — and whether eligibility criteria would include the parents of immigrants who received deportation deferrals under Obama, or only people who have children who are U.S. citizens because they were born here.
Such decisions could determine whether the program affects as many as 3 million people or more, or fewer.
In an interview, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., a leading immigration advocate, said anything fewer than 5 million to 8 million people would be insufficient. He and others argue that Obama's actions will infuriate Republicans no matter how many are affected.
"Half a loaf is going to be unsatisfactory to everyone," Gutierrez said.
© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

GOP TAKING CHARGE -- EAGER TO MOVE ON NEGLECTED KEY ISSUES.


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republicans' resounding victory gives them an opportunity to push legislation that's been bottled up in the Democratic Senate, from targeting elements of President Barack Obama's health care law to constructing the Keystone XL oil pipeline to rolling back environmental regulations.
Democrats suffered an electoral drubbing in Tuesday's midterms, and Republicans regained control of the Senate and widely expanded their majority in the House. In command in both chambers in January, Republicans maintained that they have to show they can govern or else voters will show them the door.
"We now have the votes and we have the ability to call the agenda, so stop name-calling and let's actually produce some legislation that helps jobs and the economy and moves our country forward," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said in an interview. "I think the country has figured that out, and they've given us the mandate to do it, and we better produce, or they'll kick us out too."
House Republicans are counting on Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in line to be the next Senate majority leader, to move ahead on the dozens of jobs bills that have been passed by the House but remained stalled in the Senate.
"It's jobs, jobs, jobs," said Rep. Randy Weber, R-Texas, who also wants to lift the ban on crude oil exports.
Republicans also are counting on a swift vote early next year on building the Keystone XL pipeline to carry oil from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast now that Republicans clearly have the numbers in the Senate. The GOP could have as many as 54 Senate seats if Republican Dan Sullivan prevails in Alaska and the party wins a Dec. 6 runoff in Louisiana. The House majority could reach historic levels of 250 out of 435 seats.
"It's in our best interest to show we can function and that we can lead responsibly, and that would involve getting bills that have already passed the House with bipartisan support and get Democrats to join us in the Senate and get those to the president, even something like trade," said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.
McConnell signaled Wednesday that he could work with Obama on trade agreements and a tax overhaul as both sides look toward governing rather than gridlock.
It won't be easy. Many of the moderate Democrats who would be willing to compromise were defeated in Tuesday's elections, reducing the number of lawmakers in the middle. In the next Congress, independent Sen. Angus King of Maine and moderate Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Jon Tester of Montana will hold considerable leverage.
Republicans will be under pressure from many in their ranks and outside conservatives to scrap the health care law, but McConnell and the more pragmatic GOP lawmakers acknowledge that is next to impossible because of Obama's veto power.
"If I had the ability, obviously, I'd get rid of it," McConnell said of the Affordable Care Act as he spoke to reporters at a news conference in Kentucky. "Obviously, it's also true he's still there."
McConnell indicated the GOP would push for a repeal of the tax on medical devices, which has some Democratic support, and target the requirement that individuals sign up for health insurance or face a penalty.
Obama told reporters that ending the individual mandate was a nonstarter, calling it a "line I can't cross" because it would unravel the law.
Further complicating the relationship between Obama and the newly empowered Republicans is the president's vow to act unilaterally before year's end to reduce the number of deportations and grant work permits to millions of immigrants illegally in the United States.
"What I'm not going to do is just wait," the president said as bipartisan, comprehensive immigration legislation that the Senate passed in June 2013 remained stalled in the House.
McConnell and other Republicans said such a step would be an in-your-face affront to the new majority GOP - "like waving a red flag in front of a bull," McConnell said - and Republicans would use spending bills to restrict or stop such executive action.
Several Republicans hold the deep-seated view that Obama already has been abusing his constitutional authority. "He doesn't get the line-item veto to unilaterally change different tenets of the law after he signs the law," Weber said of Obama's moves to delay provisions of the health care law.
On energy, McConnell was already exploring ways to derail Obama's plans to reduce the pollution blamed for global warming from coal-fired power plants, a maneuver that some Democrats from coal states are likely to support but that the president would likely veto.
Pro-energy Republican Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is expected to chair the Senate Energy Committee, and Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, who rejects the scientific consensus that global warming is being caused by fossil fuels, will likely lead the environment panel.
On the Keystone Pipeline, White House spokesman Josh Earnest reiterated Thursday that the administration will wait on the Nebraska Supreme Court to rule on a dispute about the pipeline's route through the state before completing an evaluation of the pipeline. "Once some of those things are resolved, then the State Department can do their work evaluating whether or not this pipeline is in the national interest of Americans," he said on CNN.
The Senate turnover from Democrats to Republicans could also complicate efforts by the U.S. to broker a new international deal to curb global warming that is legally enforceable, because a Republican-controlled Senate would be unlikely to ratify it.
"There is no way to dance around the issue that in too many races we lost good allies," said Michael Brune, head of the Sierra Club. "And we will see them replaced by people who oppose our values."