Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Was Ambassador Chris Stephens "expendable" because our top diplomat to Lybia was gay?

Verne Strickland / USA DOT COM / May 8, 2013

So the curtain has been raised on an attempt by a U.S. House Oversight Committee to probe the ugly guts of the Democrats' twisted Benghazi scandal -- or, Benghazi-Gate, as some would have it. It was arresting theater, and has the potential to derail President Obama's second term in the Oval Office, as well as Hillary Clinton's attempt to get another political life. It will continue to play out on national broadcast and cable channels, and thank goodness for that, because the interminable trial of Jodi Arias has gone to the nineteenth hole, and the players are still on the course. Can America possibly make the switch from Jodi the murderess to Barack and Hillary the international scoundrels? Heck, I don't know. I just report on this stuff. But where Benghazi is concerned, some of the most telling events in the saga can be dug up from the past. I found these two stories, buried by the Obama/Clinton press, to be especially relevant.

Did Hillary Clinton send a gay ambassador to Libya as intentional provocation?

Serbian diplomat, and friend of Christopher Stevens, says State Department knowingly sent gay ambassador to Libya.
Arab media says ambassador Stevens was gang raped and then his body was put on display.
Hillary Clinton has been spending US taxpayer dollars to fund homosexual pride events in foreign countries. Her actions have prompted backlashes against the US in Italy, Russia, Pakistan, and other nations. Last year, Barack Obama made it official US policy to fund homosexual rights groups overseas with US tax-dollars.
In Pakistan, the staff of the US embassy in Islamabad was placed in serious danger after being ordered to host a homosexual pride event. Pakistanis rioted outside the embassy and burned American flags.
Friends of Christopher Stevens in Chicago say he was gay. A member of the Serbian diplomatic team based in Chicago told that the State Department knowingly sent a gay man to be the ambassador of Libya. reports "in Chicago’s diplomatic circles at least there is no doubt that Chris Stevens was gay."
The question is, did Hillary Clinton know this? If so, she knowingly sent him into an environment where his presence would be considered a provocation. Hillary Clinton's track record in North Africa is absolutely dismal. The US State Department has successfully turned Libya and Egypt upside down and placed militant Islam in charge of those nations.
Clinton claimed that Libya and Egypt would become western style democracies. She even made the comical assertion that the Muslim Brotherhood was "committed to democracy." Now Clinton's "democracy activists" are murdering Christians in the streets of Egypt, burning American flags, and calling for holy war against Israel. Clinton seems hellbent on bringing the same chaos to Syria as well.
Clinton stated that Stevens killers were well armed and probably connected to Al-Qaeda. She neglects to mention that the Obama administration armed and supported hard-core Jihadists in Libya. Some of whom openly bragged about ties to Al-Qaeda. Hillary Clinton acts like she is surprised that such a reckless policy has blown up in her face.
According to leading Arab media outlets, the murder of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was even more horrible than what was reported in on the US media. The Arab media reports that Stevens was beaten, gang raped, killed, and then his body was publicly displayed in a manner similar to Gaddafi.
A Libyan doctor who examined the body said Stevens had severe internal injuries and died of "severe asphyxia."
Three other Americans were murdered, including former Navy Seal Glen Doherty.
Christopher Stevens is the first US ambassador to be murder overseas since Adolph Dubs was killed in Afghanistan in 1976.

HILLBUZZ 9/16/2012 — The corrupt media is still not reporting on Ambassador Stevens being raped by Muslims before and after he was assassinated.  The Left is claiming “that didn’t happen” and also showing only cropped images of the Ambassador, shirtless, with captions saying “he’s being carried to safely by helpers from the crowd!”.  No, the Muslims were stripping him naked, removing his belt and pants, and raping him. The uncensored photos show the man stripped nude and being dragged off by Muslims to be violated.
The corrupt media is whitewashing all this because it (a) makes Muslims look terrible for raping Ambassador Stevens (and then his corpse) and (b) it hurts Obama for people to know that Muslims raped the male American ambassador before and after killing him.  Male-rape is not what this administration wants to talk about six weeks before an election.

You can EASILY read all about the rape via foreign news sources in the Middle East which have no qualms reporting it.
One good source is the Lebanese media. If you can’t read squiggles and little dots that look like bugs, they have an English version too that was linked here.  The Libyan Free Press is also extensively reporting on the rape of Ambassador Stevens.