ALERT: Mere recounts will NOT detect the massive election fraud that returned Obama to office.

Verne Strickland Blogmaster / November 13, 2012

 

 

 

 

Obama didn't win office. He stole it.

 November 12th, 2012  

Unthinkable, unimaginable. Unheard of! Yet oh so verifiable.

 With great calculation and malice aforethought, the 2012 United States Elections were ruthlessly stolen from the American people – principally, invisibly!

Sure, there were ineligible voters. Voters who voted multiple times. Ballots destroyed, ballots replaced. Yada yada yada – same old nasty tricks that have occurred for centuries.

But in 2012 [and likely 2008 as well], the main crime scene? The inner workings of the voting machines.

With hacker code in place to ‘flip’ Romney [and other Republican candidates] votes AFTER the screen transaction cleared, their massive vote theft was not only stealth, it was highly effective – for it spewed results that ‘covered up’ the crime.

The code not only stole votes, it digitally altered turnout statistics. And voter ethnicities.

Making their audacious theft oh-so-explainable. “The Dems ran a better ground game.” “The Republican candidates were lackluster.” And so on and so on.

Once the polls closed, hacker code was quietly, triumphantly removed.

That’s why the 2012 Election Results were so puzzling.

Even my firewood guy, who rarely watches the news, has this figured out. At this point, from what I have assessed, it is my sense that in the Presidential Election, a good 15-17 million votes were stolen from Governor Romney.

Hard cold evidence may well reveal that this time around, in Truth, “BHOII” barely got 45 million actual votes.

That’s how much crime they needed to effect, to secure an “Obama” ‘win’.

So, rather than demand recounts, demand Forensic Investigation of the voting machines, accompanied by certified CPA Audits of the voters / votes cast.

If you don’t, you’ll miss the BIG crime stats.

Which is the only way we’ll put these creeps exactly where they belong.

Posted in 2012 Election Investigation, C.B.I., CPA Audit Of Votes, Digital Election Fraud, Election Fraud Scam, Enemies Within, It's All About Power, Spread The Theft Around, Voting Machine Forensic Investigation | Tags: 2012 Election Fraud, 2012 U.S. Presidential Election, 2012 Vote Recount, Citizens Bureau Of Investigation, Martha Trowbridge

• meyerlm says:

  November 13, 2012 at 7:49 am

  What really NEEDS to HAPPEN, is that the “National Election??” should be declared NULL and VOID and a RE-Run be DEMANDED by “WE the People”!!
  The problem is that locating enough HONEST Law Enforcement, Elections Officials and personnel to secure NON-Tampered with, correctly operating Voting Equipment, Polling-Place Monitors, e.t.c. that would secure a “FAIR and HONEST???” Election is a Daunting “MISSION IMPOSSIBLE!”
  “Voter Fraud and Tampering” has been the norm for years, and how to correct the situation is a Mystery!?
  
  

  Log in to Reply
• 1cotediaz says:

  November 13, 2012 at 5:41 am

  We would then only require a re-vote. and all votes must require id verification. go off of the past registration numbers and if not on it… no vote… period. No ID, no vote, no food stamps, no SS as well.
  
  

  Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Check These Stories ---

• Are We The People? Or We The Fools?
• The Vote You Cast – Was It One Of Millions Cast Aside?
• Pure Political Evil Is What We Are Battling
• ALERT: Recounts Will NOT Detect The Massive Election Fraud Effected
• Next Tactic: Make It Look Like Mitt’s A Natural Born Loser
• Honor Our Veterans: Trounce The Enemies Within
• The Question Is Fair: From How Far Up Did The Order Come?
• CONGRESSMAN WEST REFUSES TO ‘STAND DOWN’; FIGHTS TO RESCUE AMERICA’S ASSAULTED 2012 ELECTIONS
• So We’re Conspiracy Theorists, Eh?
• It’s A Breeze To Prove 2012 Election Massive Voter Fraud!

Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Petraeus affair: 'We should have been told.'

Verne Strickland / Nov. 12, 2012

Last week’s resignation of CIA Director David Petraeus after it was revealed that he had an extramarital affair has sparked many questions. One of those pressing issues is whether or not he will be called to testify at a hearing about the attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.
Chris Wallace sat down for an exclusive interview with Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) on Fox News Sunday.

Sen. Feinstein told Wallace that it’s up to the committee, but the first hearing will go on as scheduled before they make that decision. Feinstein also said she didn’t think President Obama should’ve accepted Petraeus’ resignation at first, but as more details came to light, she now says he did the right thing.


Wallace asked her about the revelation that the affair was discovered by the FBI after they found threatening messages the mistress, Paula Broadwell, was sending to a woman whom she regarded as a threat to her relationship with Petraeus. Feinstein commented, “I just hate to discuss it, except to say there are a number of things that one has to consider. The first of which, was there any kind of national security breach. To date, there was not.”

---

Related Links:

• Rep. Peter King Questions Timing of Petraeus Affair Revelation
• How Will Petraeus Resignation Impact Hearings on Benghazi Attack?
• Krauthammer: Mainstream Media Will Finally Pay Attention to Benghazi Story Now That Petraeus Sex Scandal Is Attached to It

---

She doesn’t believe there is a link between the resignation and Benghazi. Sen. Feinstein says she was never told by the FBI or the administration that there was an investigation into Petraeus going on, and that she first heard about it from inquiries by the media. Feinstein said, “We received no advanced notice. It was like a lightning bolt.” She added, “We should have been told.”

As a senator and the chairwoman, Feinstein said she’s most concerned about the hundreds of pages of information that indicated the personnel in Benghazi were not properly protected and why those warnings were not heeded.

Watch the full interview below:

---

Follow Fox News Insider, the official blog of Fox News Channel on Twitter and Google+!

Precedent O'Bomber finally opens up on details of Embassy attack.

Monday, November 12, 2012

By Verne Strickland

Prominent Journalist and Savage Gossip   November 12, 2012

YES, FINALLY WE GET THE EXCLUSIVE STORY ON THAT EMBASSY MESS. REMEMBER, YOU  SAW IT FIRST RIGHT HERE. AND HERE'S WHAT YOU SAW, FROM OUR PERSONAL INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT HISSELF:

• I can’t even spell Bengozzy. So how could I know what happened there?

•  I do not think my pal Joe Biden, chuckles too much. We just have a lot to be happy about. 

• I do not think Mitt Romney has a whole bunch of wives. That kind of thing only happens in places like Kenya. And maybe Chicago.

• Michelle will not wear no expensive new dress to my inauguration. She actually will wear an expensive old dress – the one Dolly Parton wore to a previous coronation. Oh . . . was it Dolly Madison? Whatever. 

•  I am inclusive in my beliefs, whatever that means. I think gays should be able to hit on the president. Just not on the First Lady. Not while I’m the big boy in the White House. Y’all got that?

• I can cry too, just like John Boehner. And I do – but never in private.

• If we had called it “Baracko” Care, we wouldn’t have had so much trouble with it. I said that to the Secretary of Agriculture. He told me, "That ain't my job."

• I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Kowalski.

• I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Boardwell. 

•  I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Madam Secretary.

• I definitely did not have no sex with that cussing preacher, Reverend Josephus Wright.

• I did not have sexual relations with nobody. Don’t ever plan to. I am the president.

• I did not “curtsy” to no dang Arab oil sheik. I bowed. I am the president

• I don’t think the Harem Globtrekkers are all black. I heard one of them has a white mother. You can't ever be too careful where that kind of thing is concerned.

• I worked hard for all Americans in my first four years. And I promise I will do that again in my next four years. That’s why I got re-elected. Voters know what I will do.

DISCLAIMER & WARNING: The preceding is all junk, all fabrication, all over. We got this tawdry bit of information and blather from an anonymous source, who refused to be quoted because he couldn't remember his name. So take your chances. Don't call me back. Just call me Verne 

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Egyptian jihadist calls for removal of Sphinx, Pyramids: 'Destroy the idols'

Verne Strickland Blogmaster, November 12, 2012

Monday, 12 November 2012

Murgan Salem al-Gohary, an Islamist leader twice-sentenced under former President Hosni Mubarak for advocating violence, called on Muslims to remove such “idols.” (Courtesy: Dream TV)

inShare12

By AL ARABIYA

An Egyptian jihad leader, with self-professed links to the Taliban, called for the “destruction of the Sphinx and the Giza Pyramids in Egypt,” drawing ties between the Egyptian relics and Buddha statues, local media reported this week.

Murgan Salem al-Gohary, an Islamist leader twice-sentenced under former President Hosni Mubarak for advocating violence, called on Muslims to remove such “idols.”

“All Muslims are charged with applying the teachings of Islam to remove such idols, as we did in Afghanistan when we destroyed the Buddha statues,” he said on Saturday during a television interview on an Egyptian private channel, widely watched by Egyptian and Arab audiences.

“God ordered Prophet Mohammed to destroy idols,” he added. “When I was with the Taliban we destroyed the statue of Buddha, something the government failed to do.”

His comments came a day after thousands of ultraconservative Islamists gathered in Tahrir Square to call for the strict application of Sharia law in the new constitution.

But in retaliation to Gohary’s remarks, the vice president of Tunisia’s Ennahda party, Sheikh Abdel Fattah Moro, called the live program and told Gohary that famous historic military commander Amr ibn al-Aas did not destroy statues when he conquered Egypt.

“So who are you to do it?” he wondered. “The Prophet destroyed the idols because people worshiped them, but the Sphinx and the Pyramids are not worshiped.”

Gohary, 50, is well-known in Egypt for his advocacy of violence, Egypt Independent reported.

“He was sentenced twice, one of the two sentences being life imprisonment. He subsequently fled Egypt to Afghanistan, where he was badly injured in the American invasion. In 2007, he traveled from Pakistan to Syria, which then handed him over to Egypt. After Mubarak's fall in early 2011, he was released from prison by a judicial ruling,” the newspaper added.

In recent months, fears have surfaced that the ultra-conservative Salafi political powers may soon wish to debate new guidelines over Egyptian antiquities.

Islamists have swept the recent presidential and parliamentary elections in the country’s post-revolutionary stage, with the Muslim Brotherhood and the ultra-conservative Salafi Islamists rising to political power.

“The fundamental Salafis have demanded to cover Pharaonic statues, because they regard them to be idols,” Egyptian author on ancient history Ahmed Osman told Al Arabiya English, explaining that Salafi Muslims follow conservative religious principles which view statues and sculptures as prohibited in Islam.

“But so far the government has done nothing to indicate what is the future of Egyptian antiquities,” adds Osman.

Many hope that Egypt’s new President Mohammed Mursi will help usher better preservation of Egypt’s proud cultural heritage. Egyptian officials have recently announced the country will reveal more of its ancient buried treasures.

The tomb of Queen Meresankh III, the granddaughter of Khufu, of Great Pyramid fame, is set to be opened to tourists later this year, with the last resting places of five high priests also slated to be put on show.

Officials are also believed to be reopening the underground Serapeum temple at Sakkara, to the south of Cairo.

House asks Clinton to testify on Benghazi, but she declines due to 'scheduling conflict'

Verne Strickland

November 10, 2012 | 1:05 pm
1087Comments

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 08: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a ceremony to present a Common Ground Award to Anne Stevens, sister of the late U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, at the Carnegie Institution for Science November 8, 2012 in Washington, DC. Anne Stevens accepted the award on behalf of her brother, who was killed in the assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya September 11, 2012. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Joel Gehrke

Commentary Writer

The Washington Examiner

@Joelmentum Joel on FB

House investigators asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to testify next week about the September 11 terrorist attack in Benghazi, but she declined citing a scheduling conflict.
“[Clinton] was asked to appear at House Foreign Affairs next week, and we have written back to the Chairman to say that she’ll be on travel next week,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters yesterday. “She has a commitment with the Secretary of Defense to the AUSMIN Ministerial.” Per AFP, “AUSMIN is the highest level forum for Australia and US consultation on foreign policy, defense and strategic issues.” The United States is reportedly concerned about Australia’s plan to cut their defense spending.
Clinton has not been asked to testify at any of the other hearings next week, Nuland said.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., has been frustrated with the State Department’s failure to provide information that she has requested.
“While I understand that investigations by the FBI and the State Department’s own Accountability Review Board are ongoing, it is imperative that this Committee, having direct oversight responsibility, be kept informed every step of the way of developments in the matter,” Ros-Lehtinen wrote to Clinton on November 7th. “[P]lease be prepared to present State Department officials to testify on these issues when Congress reconvenes later this month.”

The end of the "great white nation"?

Thursday, November 08, 2012

The end of the "great white nation"?

"Soul-searching would be markedly easier... if you, well, had a soul..."

~Tweet from Goldie Taylor~

There has been a lot of "soul searching" in the republican party these days. They still can't figure out why the man who was supposed to save America from the Kenyan Socialist lost the election. It's as if they woke up on November 7th and found themselves living in a different country. (Sorry white America, this is not your grandfather's USA.)It got so bad that white folks took to the streets and rioted. (Hey, I thought the Negroes were supposed to do that if they lost.)

Elspeth Reeve wrote about the "GOP meltdown" in the Atlantic, and she touched on an interesting subject that I have been trying to tell my one (1) republican friend for years.

"If we want to know which way the Republican Party is headed after its big losses on Tuesday, it helps to look at how conservatives are explaining Mitt Romney's loss to themselves. "This should have been a slam dunk," Rush Limbaugh said on Wednesday. "But it wasn't. There are reasons why. We're gonna have to dig deep to find them and we're gonna have to be honest with ourselves when we find the answers to this." From Republican pollsters to talking heads to activists, the reactions are on a continuum from analytical to thoughtful to insane. Here's a guide to the diggingm deep and not-so-deep:

How can we make minorities like us?

Because most of the pre-Election Day poll denialism was focused on demographics -- that there was no way the portion of the 2012 electorate that was black and Latino would be as high as in 2008, much less higher -- much of the post-Election Day soul-searching was focused on why the Republican Party is so unpopular with those groups.

At The Daily Beast, David Frum, who was outsed from the conservative movement for saying Republicans should have negotiated with President Obama on Obamacare, says that just being pro-immigration won't help the party. "It's necessary of course to refrain from insulting Latinos, or, for that matter, anybody," Frum writes. "But the crying need in the GOP is for a more middle-class orientation to politics, one that addresses concerns like healthcare as well as debts and deficits."

However, many prominent conservatives still in good standing failed to meet Frum's first requirement -- the no insults part -- even as they were talking about their unpopularity among those groups. On election night, Fox News' Bill O'Reilly said if Romney loses, it's because non-whites want free stuff.

"The demographics are changing. It's not a traditional America anymore. And 50 percent of the voting public who want stuff. They want things. And who is going to give them things? President Obama. Whereby 20 years ago, President Obama would have been roundly defeated by an establishment candidate like Mitt Romney. The white establishment is now the minority."

Rush Limbaugh, too, was at a loss to explain why minorities don't like the GOP. After all, he can name some black and Latino Republicans:

Let me take you back to the Republican convention. We had Suzanne Martinez, female Hispanic governor, New Mexico. We had Condoleezza Rice, African-American, former secretary of state. Both of those people imminently qualified, terrifically achieved... We had Marco Rubio. We had a parade of minorities who have become successful Americans... Now, why didn't that work, folks?

He continued with this theme later in the show:

It doesn't count with Obama voters about whom it is said that stuff matters most. It doesn't count. Why not? Why, putting it somewhat coarsely, why doesn't the Republican Party get credit for Condoleezza Rice?

 

 The whole country has gone to seed, Ann Coulter says. "If Mitt Romney cannot be elected, we've reached the tipping point. We have more takers than makers," a forlorn Coulter told conservative radio host Laura Ingraham on Wednesday. America "no longer is interested in conservative ideas. It is interested in handouts." The Israeli paper owned by Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire who blew so much money on the election, ran the headline, "America Chose Socialism."

Limbaugh hit on this theme too. "It's just very difficult to beat Santa Claus," he said. "People are not going to vote against Santa Claus, especially if the alternative is being your own Santa Claus." He continued that Obama supporters "think the Democrat Party's gonna punish the people who have unfairly gotten stuff that they shouldn't have. They got more stuff than other people have stuff and that stuff's gotta be redistributed."

It's not entirely about free stuff, says John Hayward at Human Events. "It’s really a battle of irresponsibility vs. freedom." He writes that conservatives must explain the true cost of free stuff, "A good portion of the middle-class 'free stuff' crowd, including quite a few of the working poor, would be much less receptive to Big Government if they appreciated that its financing is not a painless skimming of loot from bulging treasure vaults." [Source]

I suspect that republicans don't see the irony in all of this. They assume that blacks and other minorities just want "free stuff", yet they wonder why blacks and other minorities cannot embrace their party.

Republicans like to accuse liberals of being race conscious but it is the republican party and people on the right who have been obsessed with matters of race, lately. This notion that the election of Barack Obama means the end of white America is laughable and absurd. Trust me, white America will be just fine. Besides, the last time I checked Barack Obama had a white mama.
But some white folks just can't shake the browning of their country. 

"White America died last night. Obama's reelection killed it. Our 200 plus year history as a Western nation is over. We're a Socialist Latin American country now. Venezuela without the oil.

"White America died last night. Obama's reelection killed it. Our 200 plus year history as a Western nation is over. We're a Socialist Latin American country now. Venezuela without the oil."

Stunned by his clear racism, Liddy tried to walk his guest back from the ledge:
"With what you just said right there...You seem to imply that white people are better than other people. That's not really what you're saying is it?"

"Of course that's what I'm saying," Buchanan replied "Isn't it obvious? Anything worth doing on this Earth was done first by white people."

"Who landed on the moon? White people. Who climbed Mount Everest? White people. Who invented the transistor? White people. Who invented paper? White people. Who discovered algebra? White people."

"And don't give me all this nonsense about Martin Luther King and civil rights and all that. Who do you think freed the slaves? Abraham Lincoln. A white guy!"
...."But we're not led by Lincoln anymore, we're led by an affirmative-action mulatto who can't physically understand how great America once was."
"I cried last night G. I cried for hours. It's over for all of us. The great White nation will never survive another 4 years of Obama's leadership"

Liddy tried to reason with Buchanan, reminding him that he shares similar positions with the President on Afghanistan, Iraq, and relations with Russia:
"Of course I agree with half of what he does," Buchanan answered, "He's half white! That's not the half I'm worried about." [Source] 

I have to give it to old Pat, at least he is honest.







 

Posted by field negro at 6:55 PM 46 comments Links to this post

A bomb, a Dad, and a Veterans Day Plea. Inspiring? No. Heartbreaking.

• Verne Strickland Blogmaster / November 11, 2012

Jack Levison

Author, 'Fresh Air: The Holy Spirit for an Inspired Life'

Security police were everywhere. My wife and I had just returned by the late train to Munich after celebrating our wedding anniversary in a lakeside town near the Alps. As we emerged from the subway, the situation was eerie. None of the usual traffic rushed by -- just police cars, ambulances and fire trucks, all lit up, with sirens blaring.
"A terrorist attack," we thought. And, in a way, it was. Construction workers had discovered an armed World War II bomb, embedded in concrete. A real, live export, made in the USA, which had survived more than 70 years and now, on a single night would finally be detonated in an empty neighborhood, an echo of violence past.
My dad's plane may have dropped that bomb. This thought exploded inside my head. At 18, my father was the front gunner in a B-24 bomber. His squadron, based in northern Italy, flew over the Alps and bombed cities in southern Germany.
It was frightening up there, he told us, sitting in that glass bubble, flying into flack. After the war, my father suffered nightmares in his apartment in Jackson Heights. He'd stand at the window, ready to bail out, his imaginary plane in flames.
It got cold up there, too. My father put sandwiches in the armpits of his flying suit to keep them from freezing.
And it was haunting. Years later, my dad confided in us about their young bombardier, who sighted between his toes and let bombs drop, one by one, to destroy bridges along the river. None of the bombs did much, except one, which caused a massive, fiery explosion. My dad never knew what they hit. He told me and my sisters, his kids, that he hoped it had not hit anyone else's kids.


Like so many men of his generation, my father didn't talk about the war. He let these memories smolder with the worry that he had killed boys he should have been teaching baseball to or blonde-haired girls he should have been flirting with at a Bavarian beer garden.
Men -- boys, really -- like my dad had little angst over the vision of the prophet Joel, who said, "Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruning hooks into spears; let the weakling say, 'I am a warrior'" (Joel 3:10). My father was part of a whole generation of young men, along with a cadre of tenacious women, who rushed into battle. They left home to become warriors. They took their plowshares and beat them into B-24 Bombers.
But as I stood in Munich 74 years later, looking up, half expecting to see bombs falling from the sky, I remembered another prophet's vision that turned Joel's around. The prophet Isaiah dreamed of a day when nations would "beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks" (Isaiah 2:4). All of a sudden, I understood this vision in intensely personal terms, as a window to the private world of men like my father.
My father's generation and, I think we realize now, every generation of war-time soldiers struggles to turn swords wielded in Leipzig and Okinawa and Seoul and Baghdad and Saigon and Kabul into plowshares. You'd never know the struggle from the outside, like Munich on the lovely summer night of our anniversary. My dad did all the right things. He bought a house in Levittown, coached little league, helped with science projects, commuted into Manhattan,= and ate half-pound bleu cheese burgers on Saturday nights. But he hardly ever talked about the war. Those memories were left to smolder because he couldn't make the transition from war to peace, from swords to plowshares. His memories lay buried deep inside him, undiscovered, undetonated.
This year, more soldiers have committed suicide than died in combat. How can our nation, so adept at training soldiers for war, become skilled at training veterans for peace? There are promising signs: websites, suicide hotlines, even a recent Army-wide Suicide Awareness Stand Down Day, when soldiers put their weapons down to train in suicide prevention.
Yet suicide is the end of the road, not its beginning. The good people whose lives end in suicide belong to a large company of soldiers and veterans who carry invisible memories, unseen scars.
Can we visualize with prophetic daring, like Isaiah rather than Joel, strategies to equip our soldiers to turn swords into plowshares? Can we imagine, this Veterans Day, effective ways to train them to make peace -- and be at peace themselves?